“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Qualities of mercy and understanding that had been buried could now surface. [...]

[...] You (pointing to me) do not believe that nature is hostile, nor does Ruburt, but you both accept the concept that there are hostile elements against which you must protect yourselves, and that the artist or writer, or any sensitive wise person is at a great disadvantage against a system in which he is born, and that he is to some extent at its mercy.

(To Sue.) For this one over here, no probable self is at the mercy of negative thoughts of yours. [...]

[...] Once again, negative suggestion rules in the present and is projected into the future, for the individual is told that she is at the mercy of her own bodily processes, which might go awry at any moment.

[...] (Smiling:) I have mercy on your fingers.

[...] We all clapped our hands over our ears, and Seth had mercy on us. [...]

Theories of probabilities will be seen as practical, workable, psychological facts, giving leeway and freedom to the individual, who will no longer feel at the mercy of external events — but will realize instead that he (or she) is their initiator.

It is a giant step and a vital one, for without it the personality would be at the mercy so to speak of the very energy of which he is composed. [...]

[...] It is not completely at the mercy of a completed camouflage. [...]

[...] There is no reason to feel that man is insignificant, or that the individual is impotent or at the mercy of forces he can neither perceive nor comprehend. [...]

[...] I am at the mercy of my environment.’ If you do not sell yourselves short, you will say, ‘I am an individual. [...]

[...] From utter mercy I will now stop and let you go to bed.

If illness were thrust upon action or upon the personality from the outside, then the individual would be at the mercy of outside agencies, but it is not. [...]