“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(My questions had been rearoused because of an article I’d read a few days ago in a scientific journal; in their piece the authors explained that a certain significant percentage of women can develop cervical cancer from contact with a virus carried by the sperm of males who haven’t had vasectomies — or who haven’t been sterilized, in other words. I found the whole premise or situation strange indeed, I told Jane — that the male of our species actually has the potential to pass on cancer to the female. [...]

(“I believe a male.” Doug, coauthor of the object, is male.

I believe a male.

[...] (Jane smiled.) In connection with the episodes, four, four in the afternoon or four people, two male and two female. [...]

(“A male or female child?”)

[...] In connection with the episodes, four, four in the afternoon or four people, two male and two female. [...]

To sum up Seth’s somewhat amused comments in the 12th session for January 2, 1964: “Sex, regardless of all of your fleshy takes, is a psychic phenomenon, merely certain qualities which you call male and female. [...] When I say as I have that the overall entity [or whole self] is neither male or female, and yet refer to [some] entities by definitely male names such as ‘Ruburt’ and ‘Joseph’ [as Seth calls me], I merely mean that in the overall essence, the [given] entity identifies itself more with the so-called male characteristics than with the female.”

Almost always Seth refers to Jane by her male entity name, “Ruburt”—and so “he,” “his,” and “him.”

You knew him in a past life in Germany, and you have all been males and females so it is quite easily for you to relate in either direction. [...]

It has to do simply with the fact that you related as a male rather than as a female for some time because of past-life experiences. [...]

[...] One portion of himself is a character, male, with bound hands, and Ruburt must help this person over barriers, of course because his hands are tied symbolically behind his back.

[...] Even in contests between young and old males for control of a group, under natural conditions the loser is seldom killed. [...]

[...] If Seth were just my higher intuitive self, I would expect him to be feminine or to be the pseudomasculine type of male character so frequently created by women writers. Usually males instantly recognize characters drawn in this manner as overly romantic. While Seth is not “blatantly” male, in his actions and speech he is more a man’s man than the woman’s man type. [...]

[...] I am not, as I believe I have mentioned, a secondary or split personality of Ruburt’s. For example, I am not a conglomeration of male tendencies that have collected themselves into a subsidiary personality that struggles for recognition or release.

[...] My name for him is Ruburt, which happens to be a male name simply because the name is the closest translation, in your terms, for the name of the whole self or entity, of which he is now a self-conscious part.

([Gene]: “Is this person male or female?”)

To come if he is (he—a male) if he is connected with the project. [...]

[...] Her own sympathies were with the male. [...]

[...] She would have preferred to have been born a male. [...]

Someone seems to be wearing an eyeshade, a male.

Again, something to do with two people, perhaps several, both males and females. [...]

[...] Marian herself has been twice a male and twice a female. [...]

[...] If a male writer or artist had to work to develop his abilities, then a woman had to work twice as hard. [...]

[...] You help often, and have always done so, but he felt that because of the male-female relationship any help you gave was something he should be thankful for, that you were doing it out of the extra goodness of your heart—that he should not have to be grateful.

[...] Carl Jones knows Bill Herriman and Bill Granger well — but Bill Herriman and Bill Granger have never met; all three are obviously males; all bear a general physical resemblance; all fall within a certain rather broad age bracket. [...]

[...] A male student. [...]

[...] A connection with several people, two male and one female in particular. [...]

[...] This is a male. [...]

[...] Your wife has not been the symbol of a female to you, but of a male. [...]

[...] The voices were very loud, independent, each quite different from the others, and I believe, all male voices. [...]

[...] But where would the male aspect enter, unless it be a woman’s attempt to mimic as best she could the voice of a man she had admired?

(The volume and male inflection Jane achieved during her various readings was quite amazing. [...]

[...] The personality was then a male. [...]

[...] He could, for he was then a male, he could by educating his fingers, distinguish the most slightest variation of roughness and texture.