“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The landlady chose, unconsciously, houses in which the deeper needs of her tenants would in one way or another correspond with her own. This does not exonerate injustices. Nevertheless the lacks that exist, for example in your landlady, will bring about further lacks, and resentment on your part only hurts you. Does this answer a few of your questions?

Your friend Leonard’s return has changed the environment to some degree. It was his belief, quite simply, that brought about the mowing of the lawn. He is sending constructive telepathic suggestions to the landlady, and they are being received. She is highly suggestible.

Now. Take any single event or perception. I want you to see what forms an environment. We will take the simple example of the high grass. Most of the people in your house took it for granted that your landlady would not take care of the place. She is highly suggestible. She is also insecure and very on guard against threats of any kind. Her houses represent security to her.

I am speaking now of Leonard. Now your landlady is in somewhat the same position, and it is for this reason also that a corresponding sympathy is set up between them. I am trying to give you some insight into how a seemingly trivial event takes place, how telepathy and expectation enter in. These intertwinings take place all the time, beneath notice. Any physical event is the result of them.

(There followed a very confusing [and to me upsetting] several hours during which Jane and our neighbor, Leonard Yaudes, tried contacting Miss Callahan’s doctor, her relatives, her friends, our landlady, and a hospital. [...]

(“Who was Bill Macdonnel’s second landlady?”)

A small remark: The resentment of which I spoke earlier caused some overreaction on your part when you would have visited (underlined) your landlady over the dog episode—when a call was sufficient. [...]

(“Do you think last Saturday’s unscheduled session helped our landlady?”)

[...] In it Seth attempted to instruct our landlady, Marian Spaziani, regarding positive suggestion and its application to a benign ovarian tumor.

(Our landlady, Marian Spaziani, visiting with us this evening, left at 9 PM. [...]

(On Sunday, May 4, Jane spoke to F. Halliday by telephone, and was so informed by the prospective landlady herself. [...]

(In the 210th session for November 22,1965, Seth stated that he had picked up an “incipient malignancy” in Helen Dyer, who is a friend of our landlady, Marian Spaziani. [...]

The material concerning your landlady’s friend was legitimate. [...]

[...] Feeling struck me forcibly that it was caused by Marian Spaziani [our landlady]. [...]

(At 8:30 PM this evening our landlady, Marian Spaziani, and a friend of hers visited us briefly. [...]

Despite your feelings against this house, generated because of Mr. Spaziani, at least on one level, your love of it was picked up by your present landlady for several reasons having nothing to do with the house. [...]

[...] His seeking out of his friend, your landlady, was beneficial, since in harmless talk and chatter much aggressive energy was harmlessly constructed.

[...] See the summary of the unscheduled 247th session, which was held at the home of our landlady, Marian Spaziani. [...]

[...] We spent some time discussing the session, and the fact that our present landlady had gone up with us to look at the house we were interested in a second time. [...]

[...] In chapter five Jane discusses dreams furnished by four people specifically—Jane, myself, Bill Gallagher and our landlady, Marian Spaziani.

[...] Our landlady found a board in the attic and we borrowed it. [...]

If you remember, at one time when you had just arrived from Florida she convinced her landlady to give you an apartment with no money down. [...]