“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Tracing of the Ballantine Ale label used in the 10th envelope test, in the 193rd session, September 27,1965.)

[...] If all of your lives are looked at like a Ferris wheel, then this is the seat you are in when you get off, though some of the other boxes or seats may be labeled future or past.

[...] Often the person labeled schizophrenic is so frightened of his or her own energy, impulses, and feelings that these are fragmented, objectified, and seen to come from outside rather than from within.

[...] We mentioned in an earlier session something to this effect, in that you simply perceive a small portion of such action, label it as a unit, can perceive no further, and so suppose that what you see or perceive is all there is to see or perceive.

There is, incidentally, a Framework 3 and a Framework 4, in the terms of our discussion—but all such labels are, again, only for the sake of explanation. [...]

So do not label the experience you think you should have. [...]

This is another classic example of an event that science would label simply “coincidental” without being able to give any objective proof to back up its contention.

[...] The disease was not labeled. [...]

[...] Your endeavors cannot be labeled, nor can your (to me) contribution to our joint work be assessed. [...]

[...] For instead of the gun, which to Ruburt signifies destruction, purposeful destruction, you have the distortion of the eagle shape on the gun label, into a woman and child image, signifying of course creativity in this case.

(Tracing of the fragment of the old furniture label used in the 12th envelope test, in Session 196, October 6,1965.)

[...] [When Seth discusses my “dreams” in this session, however, it turns out that from his perspective he’s able to be more accurate about labeling them than I was.]

I may suggest therefore Joseph that for convenience’s sake the next such session simply be labeled “A” along with your usual designation, the next “B” and so forth. [...]

[...] She hadn’t labeled it, and I began to play it out of curiosity. [...]

[...] (To shelve Adventures,etc.) He feels free to be a psychic only when he is not labeled (underlined) one exclusively.

[...] Jane and I have yet to ask him to elaborate upon it: “There is, incidentally, a Framework 3 and a Framework 4, in the terms of our discussion — but all such labels are, again, only for the sake of explanation. [...]

[...] You insist upon labeling as laws of absolutes what is actually your distorted and limited vision of concepts as they seem to appear to you. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) Insanity, as it is labeled, is sometimes merely the result of a strange situation, in which certain individuals use the ordinarily dormant portions of the brain as well as, or sometimes largely in place of, the recognized portions. [...]

Because mental enzymes seem to give the same effects most of the time in your system, your scientists blithely label these as laws of nature; that is, the apparent laws of cause and effect. [...]

[...] You should also avoid labels, for these can stereotype your perception of yourself.”