“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

([Joel:] “That implies to me a prior knowledge of our life.”)

It does, indeed, in your terms, but that knowledge is also available to you. [...]

[...] But without their previous experience you could not have entered such a state so quickly, with so little knowledge and preparation. [...]

The entity is the sum of these layers, having all of this knowledge at conscious command at all times. [...]

[...] Duplication, exact duplication, is always merely an effect of insufficient knowledge. [...]

[...] In a fashion their knowledge is immediately acted upon. [...]

[...] When his creative abilities found contemporary scientific thought also too narrow, however, and his natural intuitions had led him toward a new framework—one that, again, introduced values having to do with the nature of consciousness, or soul—then the new ideas began to conflict directly with the old buried ones, particularly those that had to do with the conflicts between creative expression, the church, and “forbidden knowledge.” [...]

[...] You are encountering your own natural knowledge.

(Pause.) There are no fu-tile acts, for all of them are val-id, and con-trib-ute to banks of ex-peri-ence and to the birth of cells who are en-dowed with your ex-peri-ence as knowledge.

[...] You may not be able to put your knowledge clearly into words, but this will in no way negate the value or the validity of the experience that will be yours once you begin to look inward.

[...] I have to some extent explained the fascination that one has for the other, as resulting from the inner knowledge of the whole self, that strives to attain true identity as it struggles to combine and fulfill the seemingly opposite tendencies that are a part of it.

[...] Knowledge is received and transmitted in electromagnetic patterns so that one pattern can carry far more units of information than anything you have, technologically speaking. [...]

“There are many areas of knowledge in which any given individual is uninterested. [...]

[...] Peg was so curious about this that she even questioned a cab driver on his knowledge of the murder events.

After the session Rob told me he was quite certain that I didn’t consciously possess such knowledge—that my mind “didn’t work that way.” [...]

That night, Seth emphasized only the importance of inner reality and the validity of the inner senses that made nonphysical knowledge available whenever we were ready to admit it. [...]

[...] If nothing else, I thought the sessions presented a way of making deeply unconscious knowledge available on a consistent basis.

[...] But as a rule, you act upon such data without the knowledge of the ordinary conscious self.

The midplane contains a conglomeration of fragments … who have not attained sufficient knowledge or manipulability to progress further at this point. [...]

[...] Now we wonder how we managed to function effectively without all the knowledge about ourselves that we’ve received from Seth through the years.

He is obviously drawing upon knowledge that is beyond his own conscious abilities. [...] He is reaching beyond his own personal subconscious, for while the personal subconscious does have definite knowledge unknown to the conscious mind, it also has definite limits.

[...] It can be categorically stated that neither Jane nor I had any knowledge that such an investigation was underway involving Elmirans, before Seth mentioned it last week.

[...] In your physical constructions of the television set then, you are aided generally by the current idea of television set, as it exists in mass knowledge.

[...] We are attempting to work in such a manner that added knowledge from the intuitional inner self is also made known to the intellect.

We are equipping ourselves with the necessary background and knowledge. [...]

It is easy to see that you have no knowledge of the Bible —

[...] Allegorically, he represented a warring faction of the self that fights against his own knowledge and is oriented in a highly physical manner. [...]

[...] In a way your knowledge is limited to physical systems. [...]

[...] That is, the inner individualistic self forces its vision and knowledge into the world of camouflage pattern, giving its dreams a physical reality denied to the usual dream. [...]

[...] Within you also is the knowledge of other great experiments that are being tried, just as other probable systems are aware of the experiments you are involved with. [...]

[...] Their senses were extremely acute, and their ‘cultures’ dealt with a kind of transmission of knowledge that made a highly complicated vocabulary unnecessary.

(From the 242nd session for March 16, 1966:) The ego is not the most powerful or the most knowledgeable portion of the self. [...]

[...] While discussing the impossibility of any medium being an absolutely clear channel for paranormal knowledge, even when “in a trance as deep as the Atlantic Ocean,” Seth had some extremely interesting things to say about the nature of perception in general. [...]

“When such abilities as telepathy occur, this telepathic function is carried on continually by this other self-conscious part of you; but as a rule you act upon those data without the knowledge of the conscious self with which you are familiar.

[...] After that passage the diligent, consistent, intuitive, and flexible seeker-after-knowledge will find horizons of which Freud never dreamed. [...]