“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The inner self is aware of this integrity of identity, but the ego focused so securely in physical reality cannot afford this luxury.

[...] However, I hope to reinforce your inner knowledge that you do have the ability to make decisions, and good ones. [...] But your inner problem does not have to do with work, but why you did not find work in the past. [...]

[...] But your identity and your inner self is independent of these reincarnations. [...]

[...] Therefore, at no particular point is your entity, your inner self, done and completed. [...]

[...] He had, as you mentioned, the inner knowledge of his own abilities that had, he felt, to be used. [...]

[...] He felt that this same quality, physically translated, led to a physical spontaneity that would make the inner spontaneity more difficult to achieve. [...]

Gradually his belief system led to more restrictive behavior, even to some extent impeding inner flow. [...]

[...] But he was afraid that the spontaneity denied in physical life would run rampant now in inner psychic experience.

Inner data, even this, must make its entry through some distortion. [...]

I have said the universe, that is the inner universe, does expand, but does not expand in space. [...]

[...] You sensed it, hence the swelling of your hands, which is only a symptom of the workings of one particular inner sense. [...]

[...] You knew he was coming consciously, and in your inner vision you saw many things and made of them one image. [...]

You must still deal with physical reality, for it is definitely the representation of inner data. [...] Your physical condition in every way is a reflection of your inner expectations, accomplishments, and failures, and I have told you that any illness is the result of an inner distortion.

Whenever you are attached in any way, whenever consciousness is attached to a physical organism, then inner data will be interpreted in physical terms. [...]

[...] Through projections you will become acquainted with the mobility and stability of the inner self, as separate from the physical apparatus.

[...] But an equivalent exists; using an analogy, it is as if ideas are built up not through sentence structure reinforced by inner visual images, but by like “mental” patterns structured through touch and scent — in other words, thinking, but within a framework entirely different and alien to you.

[...] Man’s “I am,” [seemingly] apart from nature — a characteristic necessary for the development of his kind of consciousness — led him into value judgments, and also necessitated some break with the deep inner certainties of other species.

(Pause.) They attract you because of their instinctive knowledge, and they represent the inner freedom that man is in the process of objectifying on a conscious level. [...]

[...] You spoke in your dreams and later wrote down the alphabets—and your knowledge and your intellect have always been fired, sharpened, propelled by the great inner reality from which your minds emerged.

(9:45.) Instead, you have an inner dimension of activity, a vast field of multidimensional creativity, a Creator that becomes a portion of each of its creations, and yet a Creator that is greater than the sum of its parts: a Creator that can know itself as a mouse in a field, or as the field, or as the continent upon which the field rests, or as the planet that holds the continent, or as the universe that holds the world—a force that is whole yet divisible, that is one and the inconceivably many, a force that is eternal and mortal at once, a force that plunges headlong into its own creativity, forming the seasons and experiencing them as well, glorifying in individuation, and yet always aware of the great unity that is within and behind and through all experiences of individuality: a force from [which] each moment’s pasts and futures flow out in every conceivable direction.

The intellectual abilities as you know them (pause) cannot compare to those greater capacities that are a part of your own inner reality.

[...] You are denying your own inner voice. [...] But without me Seth couldn’t speak, and without your inner selves you wouldn’t have the knowledge.

[...] But if you’re waiting for me to have Seth come through, you should be as anxious to hear your own inner selves come through. [...]

[...] In most instances, or at least in many instances, I do not see the particular physical image of a witness to a session; but indeed as you described it, I see what you may call a composite image, an energy reality that is composed of past personalities, and in many cases also of future personalities that will be adopted by the inner self.

[...] This should prove highly interesting, and if such experiments are carried on consistently over a period of years, then the results could lead to excellent evidence for the various layers of the subconscious and the inner self, of which I have spoken for so long.

And added to this, the training will give you valuable information regarding the nature of dreams in general, the stages of the subconscious, and the inner life of the personality when it is dissociated from its physical environment to some considerable extent.

[...] Inner attunements are refined, and to some small degree you can look out through the small end of your own window, and glimpse the light at the other end. [...]

[...] You are learning inner sight. [...]

[...] It represents a certain state of consciousness — an in-between threshold dimension of awareness, in which the imagination and the senses are almost caught in the act of putting an object together, or of bringing the world into a sensed reality, brand-new, from the realm of the inner mind: a very evocative state of consciousness, and one that as I believe Ruburt mentioned, you could also use in connection with faces.

Ruburt’s body is then magically and naturally repairing itself in a function just as creative, of course, as the inner work that goes on in the production of a book or a poem — a fact he is finally getting through his head. [...]

[...] The direction of the writing changed, and this further seemed to threaten basic held inner beliefs of the overly conscientious self.

This deprived Ruburt of the deeply-rooted sense of inner natural unity when he began to rationalize this or examine it intellectually; he already questioned it, and the questioning was on the part of the overly conscientious self. [...]

[...] The animus and the anima are born into the individual with the first physical life, and serve as an inner pattern, reminding the personality of its basic unity. [...]

[...] I have to some extent explained the fascination that one has for the other, as resulting from the inner knowledge of the whole self, that strives to attain true identity as it struggles to combine and fulfill the seemingly opposite tendencies that are a part of it.

[...] Your physical universe arose from that inner framework, then, and continues to do so.

(9:50.) Give us a moment… You were born with the impetus toward growth built in — automatically provided with the inner blueprints that would lead to a developed adult form. [...]

[...] Your feelings represent the inner reality behind what you think of as purely natural phenomena, such as weather.

[...] Here you are not to hide within the closet of 3 dimensionality and cry, “It is dark and I cannot see!” And refuse to use the inner light that can alone aid your vision.

[...] This means that in your inner self you have a clear idea of the goals which Ruburt, for many reasons, some quite legitimate, hides from his practical self.

Space suits are therefore an inadequate, clumsy memory of an inner ability to clothe the inner self with whatever camouflage is at hand. [...]

They maintain their inner knowledge and integrity, and are born within any given system. [...]

[...] All of this follows inner patterns that are specifically human in your terms. [...]

[...] There is however uneasiness, as you know, in the family, and the boy operates in such a manner that he picks up the inner feelings of the others, and is left to handle them as best he can. [...]

[...] Here you are not to hide within the closet of three-dimensionality and cry, “It is dark and I cannot see!” and refuse to use the inner light that can alone aid your vision. [...]