“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Certainly, such ideas will sound like medical heresy to many readers, but the sooner you begin to look at health and “disease” in these new terms, the healthier and happier you will become. [...]

[...] I want to deal briefly with such ideas, so that later we can discuss the location of the universe.

[...] Otherwise, regarding the tooth episode in particular, there is only the fact that you have used the idea of the tooth and George’s difficulty to organize certain elements of your own experience so that by having the cavity filled a need will be satisfied.

3. As I think the ideas in the session proper are among Jane’s best, so do I think those in the material she delivered for herself are equally good.

Jane, then, wrote those two poems 16 days before she dictated the last session for Seth’s The Nature of the Psyche on April 4, 1977; one month before she began dictating Mass Events on April 18, 1977; two years and two months before she began God of Jane on May 6, 1979; two years and six months before she began dictating the Preface for Dreams on September 25, 1979; two years and eight months before she came up with the idea for If We Live Again on November 15, 1979; three years and five months before she began dictating Seth’s material on the magical approach to reality in Dreams on August 6, 1980; four years before she began dictating Seth’s sinful-self material in that book on March 11, 1981; four years and three months before she began coming through with her own sinful-self information on June 17, 1981; and four years and five months before, on August 26, 1981, she wrote the poem in Note 6 for Session 936 of Dreams: “Something in me / ebbs and tides, / as if I let myself / for a while / be washed away / out to sea / while leaving / some spidery shell / upon the shore /….”

[...] I presume that you know about the idea that we have for creating such circuits. [...]

[...] The idea of the seminar was essentially that the act of cocreating was to provide a vessel out through which something could be continually becoming. [...]

(“I’ll tell you one thing,” she said as we sat for tonight’s session, “I don’t have an idea in my head…. [...]

[...] When you give lip service to ideas with which you do not agree, you are betraying your own ideals, harming yourself to some extent, and society as well, insofar as you are denying yourself and society the benefit of your own understanding. [...]

[...] I can change this idea. I had the idea she would rather I didn’t interfere with the gestation of her books—at least this is the way my reading of them seems to have worked out in the past.)

[...] And if I were you, I would tiptoe out the door before someone tells him what you have come up with, for I am also dependent to some idea upon his receptivity and ideas. [...]

[...] You have no idea of how difficult this is for me, to reach out to your plane from mine, to perform these little tricks for you. [...]

[...] But you have no idea of what you’re asking, of how difficult it is…”

Your scientific fields of endeavor may stumble upon the mathematical probabilities involved in such other fields within perhaps a 60-year period, but they will not recognize the significance of the discovery—which will probably be made in an attempt to obtain more data concerning an idea related to Einstein’s special field theory.

This related idea will be developed by another scientist, based on the Einsteinean concept.

[...] These should be on the idea of his basic worth as a being, apart from what he does. [...]

[...] An extra copy of this dream is attached to my own notebook that I’m letting grow all by itself into ideas that may be used in a work of my own, similar to Seth’s original suggestion forThrough My Eyes.

[...] The entire idea of nuclear power was first a dream—an act of the imagination on the part of private individuals—and then through fiction and the arts a dream on the part of many people. [...]

[...] You can do the same thing without realizing it by projecting into the idea of violence, all powers, and then it seems to you that life itself has no ability to protect itself and that any stray thought of violence or disaster will immediately zoom home and that the recipient has no way to protect himself. [...]

Because you still feared the idea of letting yourself go but you will find other methods and try them out in the same way, and you will find those that are suited for you. [...]

[...] She then received the brief message from Seth, to the effect that our ideas of practicality are often hardly practical.

[...] This was Seth’s idea to compensate for the longer recent sessions and the extra typing involved.

[...] However we got involved in other affairs, and also there is some difficulty in explaining an idea to you that I know to be mental, when to you it appears as definitely a physical manifestation.

[...] I would tell Jane to remember her own idea construction, for part of the answer is certainly there. [...]

We always liked the idea, however, that others were recording class events and were keeping tapes for us if and when we wanted them; we also liked the idea that it was safer to have the tapes scattered about instead of being kept in one place. [...]

[...] The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has rejected the idea of a sealed-up radioactive power plant sitting on its island in the Susquehanna River; the danger of eventual uncontrolled contamination, including seepage into the river, is too great.²

[...] I used to equate the emotion with sentimentality—but leaving aside the basic merits of the latter, I’ve come to understand that nostalgia, growing out of its inevitable counterpart, memory, represents a facet of Seth’s idea of simultaneous time. [...]

“His ideas as he tried to explain them to you earlier this evening are excellent. [...]

I want to give you some idea of the conditions you may expect to meet in any successful projections, so that you will be prepared to some extent. [...]

[...] I had no idea who the women were, but I decided to see whether I could leap from the ground in this state to the top of one of the hills. [...]

[...] Someone told me that most of our cherished ideas about the nature of reality were completely wrong. [...]

[...] Your idea of space travel would be to send a ship from one planet, earth, outward into the rest of space that you perceive on that “flat” screen. [...]

[...] A psychic marketplace, for example, where ideas are exchanged, a place of psychic commerce, a pleasant environment with quite definite coordinates, established as an “orbiting satellite” on the outskirts of your world.

[...] (In Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality, see Session 681 at 10:00, with Note 2.) However, in a poem she wrote for me a few years later — at Christmastime 1973 — Jane herself dealt equally well with the idea of simultaneous interactions between realities:

Remember, when we speak of the beginnings of your system, we speak only in consideration of your ideas of time. [...]

[...] The idea of expressing impulses spontaneously will be most frightening under those conditions.