“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] He is, in other words, a superlative hallucination As mentioned earlier, those who believe in a hell and assign themselves to it through their belief can indeed experience one, but certainly in nothing like eternal terms. [...]

(9:40.) The hallucination is created, therefore, out of fear and of restriction. [...]

[...] The hallucinations however would be quite valid journeys into other realities.

(“Another rapidly growing field of knowledge concerns the alkaloid family of chemicals, which includes a wide variety of hallucinogens, substances that induce hallucination. [...]

[...] If a psychologist wants to say simply: Hallucination, then he would have to admit it was hardly a random thing; but well directed, to a point and for a purpose. [...]

[...] He said that he had propected his consciousness out of his body, and that no hallucination was involved. [...]

[...] It certainly seemed to give some kind of evidence for Seth’s independent nature, unless Phil hallucinated the voice and Seth took advantage of the fact and claimed it as his own. [...]

[...] Did Bill hallucinate Seth’s three-dimensional image? [...]

[...] As I told you I have some difficulty at times explaining to my own friends that you so believe such a hallucination is real. [...]

Donald, for example, may hear the hallucinated voice of the god or hero. [...]

[...] You are to forget the idea that what you see physically is the only reality, and that what only one perceived must be an hallucination if it is not perceived by the others. [...]

[...] Imagination will have opened the door and given him the freedom to perceive, but hallucination will not be involved. [...]

[...] “I suddenly realized I was hallucinating the water and stuff, that I was really in my hospital bed. [...]

(As he stated in the 68th and 170th sessions, Seth said that should he materialize in full view in the middle of the room it would not be considered as evidence by those who did not wish to believe it possible; they would ascribe it to mass hallucination, etc. [...]

The whole discussion will be leading us to an investigation of the similarities and differences between such data as dream objects, hallucinated objects, and physical objects.

There is no basic difference you see between a hallucinated object and a so-called physical object, except for the number of persons who perceive them.

[...] You know that you hallucinate the room, that you are as much in trance here as you ever are when you are in psychological time. [...]

[...] You may perfect, in other words, but you cannot again enter into that frame of reference as a completely participating consciousness following, say, the historic trends of the time, joining into the mass-hallucinated existence that resulted from the applied consciousness of your self and your “contemporaries.”

[...] They are not hallucinations. [...]

(Pause at 9:40.) Now it is meaningless to call such dreams or dream places hallucinations, for they are representations of definite “objective” realities that you cannot perceive as yet in their own guise. [...]

It may interest you to know that your athletic tendencies are somewhat involved in your out-of-body travel, in that it seems to you that the body must be poised and balanced, and have support — hence the hallucinations you use. [...]

As for my out-of-body journeys, I do often hallucinate a support of some kind in such ventures: the crossbar on a telephone pole, the fragile, topmost branch of a dead tree….

[...] Hallucination is not involved, unless I am hallucinating now as I write this page, sip my coffee, and feel honest indignation that some of us would limit our abilities to protect limited concepts. [...]

[...] She was on morphine and had hallucinations, too. [...]

[...] They may be called mass hallucinations.

“Hallucinations During Projections”

[...] (Actually I’d returned to the bedroom, I believe, still in astral form, lost the necessary focus of consciousness and hallucinated.)