“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Tracing of the fragment of the old furniture label used in the 12th envelope test, in Session 196, October 6,1965.)

[...] Some fragments of an identity simply do not wish to so develop. [...]

[...] The product of such merging is extremely individualistic, and yet more comprehensible to others than say a fragment from the dream world.

[...] My students and I both go through periods when we forget to remember and wake up for weeks at a time with only a few dream fragments. [...]

[...] This time you are both on your last reincarnation cycle on your plane, and as a rule no personality fragments are left behind.

[...] The trouble here is that the personality has little protection, and is open to fragments that may enter if the educator on my plane does not scrupulously keep guard. [...]

[...] Now in the same way do you give freedom to the personality fragments within your own dreams and for the same reason. [...]

[...] I will speak of the entity, the personalities, the reincarnations, the diverse personality fragment groupings, the planes with which you are similar or can understand, and ultimately try to deal with your questions, implied if not spoken, as to where entities came from to begin with.

The fragments that may develop from it do not make it less. [...]

[...] During the first three sessions the material came from a Frank Withers — who, it developed in the 4th session, was one of the “personality fragments” making up the Seth entity, or whole self. [...]

[...] Even when you thrust a pain apart from yourself and give it as a heritage to a fragment personality, you give it also your creative power and your hopes. [...]

[...] The form of a man, for example, may be a thought-form, or a fragment sent quite unconsciously by another individual whom it resembles. [...]

[...] At a future date I do want to go into a discussion of animal fragmentation. [...]

The ability to do this is not predestined in any way, shape or manner, but it seems to be inherent, unpredictable; but one of the basic characteristics of any given fragment.

[...] In such an eventuality, fragmentation occurred so that the abilities were dispersed, some directed into school, some into drawing, and others into his models. [...]

[...] Note the words “Election Day” and the models on the major portion of the page, which Seth alluded to in giving his impressions of the fragment. [...]

[...] Instead, I seemed to hear fragments of conversations. [...]

[...] At the moment, even the fragment she recalled is well worth trying: Seth instructed the reader to immerse himself or herself in an old photograph of a person — and then to look out at our current physical reality through that individual’s eyes. [...]

One reason, I think, that dreams seem so chaotic and meaningless at times is simply that we only remember dim fragments of them and forget the unifying factors. [...]