“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(A note: The second law of thermodynamics tells us that while the total energy in a closed system such as our universe remains constant, the amount of energy available for useful work is constantly decreasing. A mathematical factor that measures the unavailable energy is called entropy. Seth has insisted from the very beginning of our sessions that the law of entropy doesn’t apply, and that there are no closed systems.)

(Pause at 10:45.) These coordination points also serve to give your system additional sources of energy. The law of entropy does not apply, therefore. The coordination points are actually, then, sources of additional energy. They only open however when concentrations of energy build up within your system. I would like to make the idea clearer. A physical vehicle, a spaceship, for example, could never survive that kind of exit and reentry from your system.

[...] Entropy does not exist. [...]

(See the 78th session, August 10, 1964, [in Volume 2], for Seth’s rather long discussion on the fallacy of the entropy concept in physics.)

[...] And this is where your scientists get the idea of entropy.

[...] They do, however, exert some, though inconsequential, effect which theoretically could also be measured, and which would account for some of the energy considered diminished, and help to account for the entropy theory.

(Recently Jane had been reading an essay in which entropy, the mathematical measure of unavailable energy in a thermodynamic system, was discussed. [...]

However, Jane and I believe that at most the “facts of evolution” make up a working hypothesis — or unproven proposition — only, for many of evolution’s tenets, especially those involving energy/entropy (see Note 6), are open to serious challenge. [...]

[...] A measure of this unavailable energy is called entropy.

[...] Scientifically, in the closed system of our universe, the second law of thermodynamics and entropy eventually conquer all. [...]

Evolutionary thinking is challenged not only by questions of protein synthesis, and energy/entropy (see Note 5), however. [...]