“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] At one time—now at one time Ruburt’s mother and your father were portions of the same entity.

[...] Frank Withers was a fathead,’ he said, with great satisfaction, even though Frank was, according to Seth, a personality fragment of his own entity.

[...] (To me, humorously.) The familiar human component is necessary, and it is by my characteristics that you know me, but the entity is an ancient one, and we are far more concerned with other things than your position at your bank.

(Pause.) You think of entities as particles, for example, rather than as waves of energy, aware and alert, or as patterns. [...]

The place in question is located within a few blocks of the neighborhood to which my family moved in 1931, as described in Note 1. Since it sits on one of the main streets of Sayre, at a busy corner, I know that I must have passed by it many times in subsequent years; yet I’d never noticed the house as an individual entity until Jane and I walked up to its front door with the Johnsons. [...]

[...] Seth has given John the entity name of Philip, and so addresses him.

(Philip is John Bradley’s entity name, according to Seth.)

Finally, the incredibly complex physical assemblage of the human being — or of any organism, to confine ourselves to just “living” entities — always reminds me that according to evolutionary theory life on earth arose by chance alone. [...]

[...] It will be remembered that John’s entity name is Philip.)

[...] Instruments may be used to force imagination to move along in terms of its owner’s personal memories, but it cannot be forced to move along the lines of conceptual thoughts because the imagination is a connective between the physical individual and the nonphysical entity.

(John’s entity name is Philip. [...]

[...] It will be recalled that Philip is the name of John Bradley’s entity. [...]

[...] Not only would the two women be emotionally tested and enriched across physical and psychological time, but so would their entities or whole selves.

If he is a part of my entity you know that he is a hard taskmaster. [...]

[...] A miscarriage later on the part of Ruburt’s mother represented an entity who changed his mind so to speak. [...]

The subconscious, in this rather ludicrous analogy, would exist between the two brains and would enable the creature to operate as a single entity. [...]

(Mark is Bill Macdonnel’s entity name. [...]

(“Hubbell Roberts, what is your entity name?”)

Physical tools may be used to force the imagination to move along in terms of its owner’s personal memories, but it cannot be forced to move along the lines of conceptual thought, because the imagination is in reality a connective fiber between the physical individual and the nonphysical entity.

[...] This could result in a temporary, but thoroughly frightening existence between planes that would require utmost caution on the part of the entity. [...]