“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

2. A reminder: Seth usually calls Jane by her male entity name, Ruburt — and thus “he,” “him,” etc.

[...] “It’s got to do with understanding that one must protect or encourage personal integrity before anything else,” I said, “even if it means projecting one’s troubles out onto an entity like Prentice, the church, or whatever. Even though we can’t blame those entities, really, for doing much that we hadn’t allowed them to do....” [...]

[...] She now amazed me by saying that she now thought she understood that if she turned her focus away from her symptoms toward Prentice, say, or any other “outside” entity or situation, that she could improve physically by giving her body the freedom to do so. [...]

(And here I must admit that although Seth gave the entity name for Bill’s wife Ida, I did not think quickly enough to ask for the entity name of Ida’s twin sister. Jane and I are curious to see if there is any similarity in entity names under such circumstances, and I will make it a point to ask Seth for the name.)

[...] But more than this, why not call all actions of the brain “altered” when compared to Seth’s concept of the individual personality’s whole self or entity?¹

1. See Seth’s definition of the entity as given in Chapter 5 of The Seth Material.

Now, to begin with your dream: The entity is aware of the experiences of all of its personalities. [...]

To the entity, your own consciousness could be likened to one stream of consciousness, in your terms. [...]

[...] In the case of entities, each such self dwells entirely in its own dimension or system of reality.

And this is the place to mention one of those happy analogies that I’m able to make occasionally (even though in this case it took me several months after I’d had my own little double dream to come up with the very obvious association) — for in our reality, the double or multiple dream happening offers at least a pale insight into the numerous lives that, according to Seth, our entity or whole self experiences simultaneously.

I am now in contact with your parent’s entity and he tells me that subconsciously even his present personality, that is your father, appreciates this fact and loves you deeply. He himself, that is your father’s entity, feels no pain because of the present personality’s problems, since he is working out so many necessary kinks.

Your father’s entity’s name is Arruhk, A-r-r-u-h-k. I cannot go into all the problems of his present personality. They are definite challenges that he had to face, and the overall entity is facing the majority of these in one fell swoop, for his own reasons.

(“What is the name of my father’s entity?)

[...] Cells, as entities, do not drop off like apples; I was using, I suppose, a kind of shorthand I believed was clear in the context given.

[...] It is futile to question: “What is the difference between my psyche and my soul, my entity and my greater being?” for all of these are terms used in an effort to express the greater portions of your own experience that you sense within yourself. [...]

There would be no experience of what Ruburt (Seth’s “entity” name for Jane) calls “the dear privacy of the moment,” so if one portion of your being wants to rise above the solitary march of the moments, other parts of your psyche rush, delighted, into that particular time-focus that is your own. [...]

[...] This applies equally to Ruburt and Joseph (Seth’s entity name for me). Thus far, my books have included Joseph’s extended notes. [...]

[...] Jane’s pace was quite slow.) The Christ entity was one. [...] The Christ entity had many reincarnations before the emergence of the Christ “personality” as known; as did the Buddha.

[...] Also, do we need to know more about the other two personalities belonging to the Christ entity: Christ Himself, and John the Baptist?”)

[...] This effect symbolizes Jane and me at the bottom or base of the pyramid, with Seth in the middle and Seth’s entity, represented by the new voice, at the top or peak.

[...] Seth had been his usual energetic self, in marked contrast to the cool and distant voice of his entity, so called.)

[...] It was a hard thing to describe, she said, and echoed my question about it being my own entity, or a portion thereof. She felt a great love from the entity. [...]

[...] Remind me, for our next session, to wind in a discussion of those subjective entities as they learned how to translate themselves into physical individuals.

Through their work with particle accelerators, or “atom smashers,” physicists have discovered that protons and neutrons themselves are composed of forces and particles that in turn are almost certainly composed of forces and particles, and so on, in an ever-descending scale of smaller and smaller entities and concepts. [...]

[...] These nonphysical entities—and many others of a like nature—are emanations of consciousness, or All That Is, and in “size” rank far below the tiniest particles ever observed in an atom smasher. [...]

(Marleno is Lorraine Shafer’s entity name. [...]

[...] The whole self, or the entity of which I speak, is composed of all of these selves, but it must be realized that all divisions between these selves are illusions, basically speaking. [...]

Such communication between these various selves who compose an entity is natural, continuous. [...]

[...] As soon as she gave the initial M, in the beginning of the data, she thought of Lorraine’s entity name, Marleno. [...]

And yet, as a gardener sometimes at night walks through his garden and observes his plants—and gives added fertilizer to some—and waters others—and arranges others so that they get more sun—so your own entity walks through your soul and whispers instructions. [...]

The entities that were to dwell within your system prepared the system for their entry. [...]

The woman’s entity name is Aeiada, A-e-i-a-d-a, and the man’s is Norman. [...]

(“What is the child’s entity name?”)

His entity name is Waldoon. [...]

[...] She thought Seth would speak on time this evening, in continuing answer to my question in the 422nd session; concerning the manner in which Seth’s larger entity appreciates our time system.

[...] Other portions of my entity are aware of it, by a process of mental osmosis, so to speak.

Those portions of my entity that have not had physical experience, however, do not operate within that time system, at any time(smile), if you will excuse the pun. [...]

[...] The geese looked very vulnerable against the massive roll of the earth beneath them, but this was an illusion: Like every other entity on earth, each one of those birds knew very well what it was doing. [...]

The entity name of our visitor is Marleno.

[...] There is a similarity here to the entity name, Marleno.

[...] It will be remembered that Philip is the entity name for John Bradley, who first mentioned the sessions to Lorraine. [...]

Now at various times you have questioned what the entity actually was, and wondered how fragments, or fragment personalities, could ever become entities, if they ever did.

[...] This may seem a far cry from a discussion of entities. [...]

[...] Seth could still be a part of an ancient entity, and Seth Two another portion more evolved in our terms. [...] I don’t find it difficult to accept the possibility that we might be independent fragments of such entities or clumps of consciousness. [...]

[...] I do think that Seth is part of another entity, and that he is something quite different from, say, a friend who has “survived” death.

[...] It is not used by more advanced entities nor by less developed ones than ourselves. [...]