“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In a like manner for example, the act of dreaming itself changes both the dreamer and the dream. [...]

[...] Usually they are vague grandiose dreamers, whose plans almost completely ignore the full dimensions of normal living. [...]

In conventional terms they may appear to be great activists and revolutionaries, or they may seem to be impractical dreamers. [...]

[...] It is impossible to study dreams when an attempt is made to isolate the dreamer from his own personality, to treat dreams as if they were physical or mechanical. [...]

I do not believe that Philip has read the material dealing with the perspective universe, in which the dream is projected into a changing but durable and quite real existence, independent of the dreamer.

[...] The sun shines, the writer writes, the artist paints, the thinker thinks, the dreamer dreams, and each of you, whether you know it or not, naturally follow your own natures. [...]

(To Florence.) Now last week when Ruburt was speaking about the natives who are such expert dreamers, you asked, our Lady of Florence, then why are they not more progressive? [...]

(10:16.) Now: In almost all instances, demons in dreams represent the dreamer’s belief in evil, instantly materialized. [...]

The dreamer is not aware of the actual passing of physical hours. [...]

[...] Though you recognize in a dream the complete furnishings of an actual house, still the dreamer lies in his bed. [...]

[...] The variations mentioned above are intriguing in themselves, and range from an account of an “overlapping double dream” — that is, the individual’s second dream began in the middle of the first one, and extended beyond the end of the first dream — to one in which the dreamer told me, “I knew I’d been having two dreams at once, but I remembered them almost as one dream.”

[...] In the dream state it would be impossible for the dreamer to prove the existence of the familiar street outside of his familiar door. [...] Highly difficult indeed, for such objects do not exist for our dreamer.

For that matter, some intuitive understanding of the inverted time system can be achieved through a study of time as it appears to the dreamer.

[...] The dreamer is baffled at his own ability to forsee a future event, and this makes him more than ordinarily curious about the nature of dream life in particular.

[...] Such knowledge can be highly practical and in many instances, the dreamer is the most practical individual. [...]

[...] It goes without saying that a sense of time may or may not be interwoven in any given dream sequence, but you as the dreamer are not conscious of the physical hours that pass as you sleep.

[...] That is, I speak of the doer, the mover, the breather and the dreamer as all belonging to one whole self.

[...] The breather and the dreamer are not so automatically controlled as it would seem. [...]

[...] Mankind simply refuses to admit the breather and the dreamer.

Dreamers plunge