“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The death occurred in desert. [...]

[...] It saw a good God, a just savior, who nevertheless never thought twice about sending down death and destruction as punishment for sin. [...]

[...] For if you believe you exist only within the context of this life, that you are born only to death and annihilation, then you will not use your freedoms in this existence, and you deny their abilities when they show themselves, and no one forces this bondage upon you but yourself. [...]

[...] In those times, death was not feared as it is in your terms, now, for the cycle of consciousness was understood.

[...] (In parentheses: After death, for example, you still possess a memory, though it does not operate through the physical organism as you understand it.)

(And Sarah, the first one, if she hadn’t burned to death she would have died anyhow at 17. [...]

[...] Though we found them intriguing, we certainly weren’t convinced that Seth was someone who had survived death. [...]

(“In a session I’m working with now for Mass Events—the 837th, about the death of our cat, Billy One, a year ago—you said there wasn’t any such thing as a cat consciousness, per se.”³ Seth nodded. [...]

[...] They daydream of cruel deaths. [...]

[...] As we searched for understanding, we reviewed the excellent material on death, as well as suicide, that Seth had given in the very first session for Mass Events: In Chapter 1, see the 801st session for April 18, 1977.

[...] Our third law is spontaneity, and despite all appearances of beginning and end, of death and decay, all consciousnesses exist in the spacious present, in a spontaneous manner, in simultaneous harmony; and yet within the spacious present there is also durability.

[...] According to the geological/fossil record, this conflict had resulted in the deaths of entire species. [...]

[...] Once again we have consciousness seeking to know itself in as many ways as possible, while being aware all of the time, in those terms, of the forthcoming “death” of its medium of expression, DNA, and of DNA’s host, or “physical machine.”

[...] What appears to be struggle and death to you at those levels is not, now, for the experience of consciousness itself is different there, as is the experience of your own cellular composition.

[...] There are many courses that you can follow after death after you have finished your reincarnation. [...]

One of the Roman soldiers, Maumee, and Nebene are mentioned in Appendix 21; see the excerpts there from the private session for November 18, 1974, as well as Note 1. Then see the comments Seth made the next evening in ESP class: “There are, of course, future memories as well as past ones … As Joseph often says: ‘When you think of reincarnation, you do so in terms of past lives.’ You are afraid to consider future lives because then you have to face the death that must be met first, in your terms. [...]

[...] I remarked about the opinions of others when they read our deleted material after our deaths, for instance, whereupon Jane said that more than once she’d had the idea of destroying all our personal material when we were older.

[...] It is not death any of you have to worry about. [...]

[...] Otherwise it will fight the spontaneous self, even to the death. [...]

[...] You may find after death a much stronger relationship emotionally with a personality from a past life. [...]

[...] At least, I thought as I described the experience to Jane, I dared face my death in that life after the fact of its happening, even if I didn’t care to undergo the actual process.

[...] In the beginning, I took it for granted that Seth was a subconscious fantasy, personified, because I simply couldn’t accept the possibility of “spirits” or, for that matter, life after death. [...]

[...] But, scientifically again, this would not be proof of my existence as an independent personality who has survived physical death. [...]