“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I would make clear the nature and conditions in which I now have my existence, and explain some of the reasons for the various, often contradictory, statements made concerning life after death. [...]

[...] I had many death days, but I do not have those now either.

[...] How could their thoughts allow them to bring about their [bodily deaths]? [...]

[...] I believe that a forementioned death will result in a change of policy in one respect, and a change in policy will help quicken the advent of the new product. [...]

“Can you give us the year of your death?”
     1942

[...] For one thing, of course, neither of us particularly believed in life after death—certainly not conscious life, capable of communicating. [...]

“Maybe,” Rob said, then added with a grin, “Maybe he actually is someone who survived death.”

[...] My own idea is that this refers to the recent death of a priest Jane knew in her teens. A couple of weeks ago she received notice of his death, with a photo of him edged in heavy black. [...]

[...] This may or may not be a reference to death.

[...] If the person is mourning the death of a spouse or close family member, then it would be most beneficial for the individual or the family to purchase, or otherwise provide, a new small pet. [...]

[...] These levels are indeed filled with what may be termed life-giving and death-tempting differentiated and undifferentiated impulses acquired in the present life of an individual. [...]

[...] It will be shown that personalities continue to exist after physical death, and then it will not seem so strange that those such as myself can communicate.

[...] In your terms, by the time an individual is in his last physical life (pause), all portions of the personality are then familiar with it at the time of death. [...]

[...] Such an individual then can understand the nature of hallucinations at the point of death, and with full conscious awareness enter into the next plane of existence. [...]

[...] It schematically shows the relationship of the individual birth-to-death cycle (including probable events), to the other, successively less differentiated kingdoms or realities that help make up the world. [...]

For additional material on cellular life and death as mediated by Seth’s CU’s, or units of consciousness, see the 688th session between 10:26 and 10:59: “When the cell dies physically, its inviolate nature is not betrayed. [...]

(The day before the 724th session was held on December 4, I had another experience involving internal perceptions of myself as a Roman soldier in the first century A.D. As far as I can tell, however, this latest episode was not a continuation of my three visions of last October, in which I saw the end of my life while I was an officer in the armed forces of Imperial Rome¹ — yet this time also I confronted circumstances surrounding my own death. [...]

[...] As stated, this makes the second time that I’ve had an experience involving the violent death of a Roman soldier in the earlier part of the first century A.D. (I never did arrive at names for those two militant individuals.) Perhaps both instances are merely my own psychological reflections of present concerns or challenges, although I think that more is involved. [...]

[...] Seth referred to Nebene in the 721st session also.⁹ Here too, through that individual, the ramifications of authority are confronted again; if in a way less drastic than one involving death, still certainly in a very dogmatic manner, as expressed through Nebene’s rigid personality. [...]

(Saturday evening the three of us sat in the living room discussing Marian’s recent dream, which she thought might presage her own death. [...]

[...] He has been trying to communicate with you, and you must indeed relax for you are the one that adds these symbols of death. [...]

[...] If you want to create another personality then you think in terms of a perfect personality and the perfect personality does not exist, for perfection in your terms means death. [...]

[...] Yet I like lines like: “Let the dirge be heard, sweeping all things before it,” and: “I’ve developed a sense of death, when someone takes a few steps off the known path almost unknowing,” and: “I breathed in the public air and it became private.” [...]

[...] And her innate mystical nature must fully know and accept that the time, manner, and method of her physical death, whenever it occurs, is as much a part of her body’s life as its life is. [...]

[...] At that moment of joining with her whole self, whenever her “death” does take place, all will be resolved with the finest creativity and understanding, for I believe that Jane herself will certainly continue “living” as an individual.

[...] We will discuss the aspects connected with a long, healthy, fairly happy lifetime, and those involved with early death, severe illnesses, and suicide — particularly with the suicides of fairly young persons.

[...] The records meant life or death if they were discovered at the wrong time. [...]

[...] These were life and death struggles. [...]

Many who unexpectedly commit great crimes, sudden murders, even bringing about mass death, have a history of docility and conventional attitudes, and were considered models, in fact, of deportment. [...]

A fantasy of beating a parent or a child, even to death, will if followed through lead to tears of love and understanding.

[...] You are denied tomorrow’s wisdom only because you believe time is a closed system.¹⁴ It is true that you are subject to birth and death, yet within that framework far greater dimensions of experience are possible than are usually experienced.

6. For material on the death — and life — of Rooney, see these sources: in Personal Reality, sessions 638–39 in chapters 9 and 10, respectively; in Dialogues, Part 3.

Many people no longer believe in life after death, and so large numbers of the population are philosophically denied a spiritual or a physical future.

[...] You will be subjectively alive after your death. [...]

[...] His mother’s death, the fact that you left your job, and his own growing understanding released him first in financial terms, because of an always latent knowledge and belief in the reality of abundance—his father did have abundance even while Ruburt believed in poverty as a child.