“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Our method does not involve such dangerous territory.

You are in no danger however as long as you pursue your present course, but you are in peril as soon as you change it. [...]

Some conditions, some roads and countries, would require different beams to meet different circumstances, as even in automobiles you use high beams or low beams according to necessity or utility; and in some cases the high beams would not only be ineffective but dangerous, and so low beams are used.

[...] Otherwise if the ego is pushed aside it will rise up in arms and in opposition, and can be highly dangerous.

In the latter case which you followed you allowed your psychic energies to drop to a very low and dangerous ebb, from which you are now just emerging. [...]

[...] If the advice was not heeded, and as the situation grew worse, a danger point would arise beyond which the personalities could not safely continue their association.

[...] Any fanaticism is truly vicious, one-sided, limiting, and causes an alarming shrinkage of focus that is explosive and dangerous. [...]

There is really little such danger involved here. [...]

[...] There have been experiments upon your earth (by consciousness) with both men and animals at a different level than just mentioned, but with that in mind — herds of animals, for example, with each animal quite aware of the joint knowledge of the herd, the dangers to be encountered in any individual territory, and a psychological structure in which the mass consciousness of the herd recognized the individual consciousness of each animal, and protected it.

[...] This sort of dissociated state can be dangerous, particularly when induced haphazardly, as was certainly the case with you. [...]

This data is often wound by the dreaming self into a dream drama, which informs the subconscious of dangers, or of the probable success, of any given event which is being considered by the subconscious as suitable for physical actuality.

I have often told you of the possible dangers involved in approaching experiments without the safeguards of discipline and study. [...]

(A week or so ago I forgot to buy gasoline, and this led to a situation that could have been dangerous. [...]

[...] I know that you are aware of the dangers involved in projecting your own fears and irritations upon others. [...]

[...] This is not only a false belief but a dangerous and limiting one.

[...] There are dangers that do not exist when the other two forms are used.

[...] If Ruburt were in danger of any serious illness, I would know it. [...]

[...] The same applies to many who follow dangerous professions. [...]

There is no danger, and I will repeat this: There is no danger of dissociation grabbing a hold of him like some black, vague and furry monster, carrying him away to the netherlands of hysteria, schizophrenia, or insanity … Withdrawal into dissociation as a hiding place from the world could, of course, have dire consequences. [...]

(From the 28th session for February 24, 1964:) As far as Ruburt is concerned, there is no danger [to him in these sessions]. [...]

[...] This can be highly dangerous, however.