“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Nothing exists outside the psyche, however, that does not exist within it, and there is no unknown world that does not have its psychological or psychic counterpart. [...]

What counterparts break

[...] These were all males because at that time of your development, you would not have accepted a female counterpart.

[...] The brain’s genius comes from the mind, which can be called the brain’s biophysical counterpart.

[...] The young child dreaming of its own future counterpart, for example, attains a kind of psychological projection into the future of its world. [...]

[...] Every physical manifestation that you know has its nonphysical counterpart, in which it is always couched, from which it came, and to which it will return.

[...] Within the electrical system, intensity is also responsible for the potentiality, duration and electrical mass, which is a mass of a different sort; a mass that takes up no space, and is not made of matter as you know it, but mass whose thickness is one of varying electrical intensities which form a definite shape, a separate field more or less, an electrical coded counterpart for physical matter.

[...] Here is question 1: When I project while I am pregnant, is my astral body pregnant; i.e., does the astral body carry the astral counterpart of the fetus, or does the astral fetus remain in my physical body, within the physical fetus? [...]

[...] For reason and emotion are natural counterparts.

The energy of this inner self is directed and used by it to richly form from itself, from components and inner experience, a material counterpart in which the outer ego then can act out its role. [...]

[...] I don’t think it any coincidence that Jane contacted Eleanor, who is the editor for Dick Bach, who is a counterpart of Jane’s. [Jane first called Pat Golbitz, but Pat was out of her office—so Pat doesn’t get to see Emir first.]

The other part, / dispassionate, / flows together /
with the waves / past world and rock / dispersed as mist, /
beyond impediments / uncaring / while my heart /
in the fragile shell / calls out, / “Come back /
dear counterpart. [...]

My counterpart says, / “Those treasures / are marked with /
your name / and will be arriving / each day for a while, /
marvelous surprises / from the most mysterious / of places. [...]

[...] I used to equate the emotion with sentimentality—but leaving aside the basic merits of the latter, I’ve come to understand that nostalgia, growing out of its inevitable counterpart, memory, represents a facet of Seth’s idea of simultaneous time. [...]

[...] And by exploring that which you cannot touch, you will discover that which is even closer to you than touch, for the outer sense of touch is one of the most close counterparts of direct experience that you have. [...]

[...] First had come her reactions to a group of upsetting letters she’d received this noon: One is a 20-page missive from a mental patient who wants returned to him all of the notes, objects, manuscripts, and books of poetry he’s sent her over the years: another is from a woman who informed us that she’s writing a book dictated by Seth: a third is a long letter from a man who’s claiming us as his counterparts, for reasons we can’t agree with. [...]

[...] And he simply shows those portions of his reality that are also counterparts of your own reality that exists within you. [...]

If the outer ego would be content to work on an equal basis with its inner counterpart, then many severe difficulties would be sidestepped.

(Recently I’d mentioned to Jane that it would be nice if Seth would say something about the speakers, and counterparts.)

[...] It is the mind, then, as the brain’s nonphysical counterpart, that decides what data will activate the brain in that regard. [...]

This knowing will give you the conscious knowledge that is a counterpart of the animal’s unconscious comprehension.

(Pause.) These selves are different counterparts of yourself in creaturehood, experiencing bodily reality; but at the same time your organism itself shuts out the simultaneous nature of experience. [...]

[...] His desire for truth inflamed them, and all of their aspects, even while his methods served as counterparts against which they rebelled.