“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Instead, I seemed to hear fragments of conversations. [...]

[...] A delightful conversation followed. [...]

“I enjoy speaking with you for a few moments of what you might be pleased to call normal conversation. [...]

[...] In a lull of conversation, Peg G. leaned forward and said: “I was at Lib’s Supper Club, and your paintings are still there,” or other words to that effect, mentioning both Lib’s and the paintings.

I wanted to know that I was present here this evening and that I have been listening to your conversation. [...]

[...] When you curse another, you curse yourselves, and the curse returns to you.’” The answer must be considered in the light of the previous conversation, in which the student was trying to justify violence as a means of attaining peace. [...]

[...] She was having an animated conversation with John as 9 PM approached; when she began without the usual greetings, she flicked the recorder on.)

I will let you take your break, out of the goodness of my heart, and also so that I might have the benefit of your brilliant conversation between my material. [...]

3. In none of our conversations involving Mrs. Steffans did Jane and I talk of blame or guilt in connection with suicide. [...]

(Our conversation about this during break led me to what I think is an exceptionally good idea for a book—one done even in conventional terms. [...]

[...] Only when the private nature of reality was emphasized sufficiently would I be ready to show how the magnification of individual reality combines and enlarges to form vast mass reactions — such as, say, the initiation of an obviously new historical and cultural period; the rise or overthrow of governments; the birth of a new religion that sweeps all others before it; mass conversions; mass murders in the form of wars; the sudden sweep of deadly epidemics; the scourge of earthquakes, floods, or other disasters; the inexplicable appearance of periods of great art or architecture or technology.

[...] What about mass conversions? [...]

[...] It was an attempt on the part of fundamental denominations to solve the problems at another level, through an influx of religious identification, conversion, and enthusiasm.

If your Friday get-togethers have become boring, it is to a large extent because you have both allowed them to do so, and not taken the lead in directing the conversations along more responsible lines. [...]

(To Theodore.) Now, I simply came to let you know that I was in on your conversation, and because I did not want to have you think that I played your little trick and rob you of the pleasure of realizing that you did it for yourselves. [...]

Conversation could then be carried on. [...]

(She hasn’t undergone a classical religious conversion of the kind William James describes in his The Varieties of Religious Experience,⁴ yet more than once she’s known her own forms of ecstasy, or deep alteration of consciousness, or illumination — whatever one chooses to call such states. [...]

[...] You might find such a conversation intriguing. [...]

[...] You understand that I, myself, could converse in this fashion for many hours. [...]

This evening for example, your after-dinner conversation aroused Ruburt’s own fears, sent him into an emotional state in which he accepted them, used them, exaggerated even his desperation, hoping to force an answer.

[...] Prior to the start of the session I had, in conversation, asked Robbie [Joseph] a question involving his point of continuous existence versus evolution. [...]

[...] During our private and book sessions Seth’s voice effects are usually quite conversational in tone and emphasis, and he speaks slowly enough so that I can comfortably take notes. [...]