“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In a reality that is inconceivably multidimensional, the old concepts of God are relatively meaningless. [...]

[...] If you will try to accept the idea that your own existence is multidimensional, that you dwell within the medium of infinite probabilities, then you may catch a slight glimpse of the reality that is behind the word “god,” and you may understand why it is almost impossible to capture a true understanding of that concept in words.

[...] It is as you know an extremely difficult topic because of the limits of your own conceptions. [...]

[...] Nevertheless, for all the appearance of permanence and rigidity, your chair is only a chair by virtue of your own concept—gestalt, that is in itself severely limited due to the limitations of outer senses. [...]

[...] Incidentally Joseph, you were correct: I have been teaching Ruburt to feel concepts, rather than delivering them to him word by word, even though that is how he must deliver them to you.

[...] However this takes more out of Ruburt, since he must then, with my help, translate direct experience-concepts into a succession of meaningful words.

Your idea of a god, in fact any concept held by humanity, represents at best a very small and insignificant idea, based upon the root assumptions of your own system. [...] Even in this limited conception of yours then, the concept of a human god is almost meaningless, and there are many other systems in which the word humanoid would have no real meaning at all.

[...] I am making an attempt to verbalize concepts that almost defy the edges of the intellect, unless that intellect is thoroughly reinforced by the intuition’s strength. [...]

(I’ll add that Jane and I have received several thousand letters since the publication of Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality. As best I can remember, however, not a single writer has mentioned the sleepwalkers—one of Seth’s most intriguing concepts.)

[...] I can see how such a concept can be postulated mathematically—but could it ever have really happened in ordinary terms?

[...] Somehow the two incidents described, involving Rusty and Hal, and Carol and Fred, had served to impress upon me the validity of Seth’s ideas about Frameworks 1 and 2 in ways that the intellectual understanding of those concepts alone hadn’t done. I found myself trying out the concepts as I worked—and they worked. [...] It seems that we can put the concepts of the frameworks to use in all areas of daily life, reinforce longtime goals, etc.

You think that the soul is a white wall with nothing written upon it, and so your idea of sacrilege is to shit upon it, not realizing that the shit and the soul are one, and that the biological is spiritual; and that, again — if you will forgive my homey concept — flowers grow from the shit of the earth. [...]

[...] Then I’ll refer to the concepts of perception theory and privation theory.

[...] The counterpart notion is Seth’s timeless version of his concept of consecutive incarnations. [...]

The ordinary violence involved with these events leads me to comment upon the theological concept of privation theory, and [...]

I don’t mean at all to put down everything we’ve created in our world, and to proclaim that Seth’s concept of All That Is is [...]

[...] With the current concepts held by your society, men and women fear old age from the time of youth. [...]

Through the ages, again, underground philosophies have tried to combine the two concepts, usually going from one extreme to the other in combating the current ideas in historical terms. [...]

These concepts have many cousins, so that we actually have an entire family of beliefs that are all in one way or another related.

[...] Those who relied upon limited concepts will be bound by them until they learn to leap beyond. [...]

[...] As Seth talked she had feelings of concepts, of things “opening up.” She felt herself rushing in various directions, she said, inspired by these concepts, then giving voice to them one by one as she reached them. [...]

You understand the concept of the spacious present. [...]

I have told you often that you do yourselves a grave injustice by limiting your conception of the self. [...]

[...] (Pause.) What you perceive of time is a portion of other events intruding into your own system, often interpreted as movement in space, or as something that separates events — if not in space, then in a way impossible to define without using the concept of time.

[...] I hope to make it much clearer to you, but it involves part of a larger concept and as yet you do not have the necessary background.

[...] When your scientists get through with all their high fiddle-faddle they too will discover that this is the case, though woe to any one of them that dares breathe such a concept yet.

(Intently:) I am trying to tell you something about the greater reality of your species, yet to do so with any justice, I must divest you, if possible, of certain concepts about the beginning of time, or “man’s early history.”

[...] Here’s what I wrote at 9:55 in the 24th session for February 10, 1964: “Jane reports that when she pauses for Seth during a delivery, she can sense the whole concept of the subject being discussed. [...]

And added later: Also in that session, Seth describes how he must “disentangle concepts” from their patterns in order to relate them through Jane. [...]

[...] As he presented them, his concepts dealt with the spontaneous, rambunctious powers with which nature was endowed. [...]

[...] When you thoroughly understand what is meant by the entire safe universe concept, then the physical, cultural climate is understood as a medium through which the ideal can be expressed—can be expressed. [...]

[...] It is seen as basically so weak that it requires an artillery of attitudes and a fortress of concepts to protect it. [...]

The concepts themselves are difficult verbally to express. [...]

[...] He did willingly answer many other questions asked by Ann, Marilyn and Don, questions mostly based on the material itself and the concepts involved.

The dimensions of action itself have nothing to do, basically, with your conception of time. [...]

Your concept of time does not of course change time itself, but it does force you to perceive actions in a certain manner. [...]

Because you are obsessed with the idea of time as past, present and future, you are forced to think of reincarnations as strung out one before the other, and indeed we speak of past lives simply because you are used to the time sequence concept. [...] To make the concept understandable to you it is convenient to speak of past and future reincarnations.

[...] Now to an observer whose time concept was still further segmented, and slowed down in comparison to your own, then theoretically within his time system the four personalities would indeed appear to be four separate existences in fact. [...]

[...] In one session, Seth discusses Jung’s concept of the unconscious. [...]

[...] The archaic concept of God (at that time) nicely covered such matters. [...]