“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The new individual is either with the company or strongly connected with your attitude toward the company. Please wait until I am finished with spontaneous impressions for your questions, and then I will try to answer them.

(The following is a resume of John Bradley’s comments regarding the impressions given above. There was an initial encounter with a man in the company, in the immediate past—two weeks ago. The man, according to John, was also strongly connected to John’s feelings about the company [or attitudes toward it] for he felt that the new man, a regional director, has some of the same attitudes he has.

([John:] “Is he with this company?”)

Give us a moment. A new product being developed by the company that affects the nervous system, a strong U, long U sound connected with it. And a revival here, a stock revival. The product is in the works, so to speak, but that is all at present.

[...] Directed correctly, this company can become far more than it has been. [...] Daring both in the choice of men, those who will represent the company to the public, and in the choice of men who will develop products, and this is an area with which you should become more familiar, for it is this upon which the company depends.

You will end up in a position of dominance in the company if you persist, but this is not today or tomorrow, and the company will have changed. [...]

[...] The company is plastic. [...] You are an old feudal lord, and the company is your territory. [...]

[...] You should pay more attention to the basis on which the company ultimately rests, or the company will be outstripped. [...]

(John Bradley said he was thoroughly convinced that a reorganization would have to take place in his company, that great financial losses were being suffered. This theme has run through Seth’s predictions concerning John’s company for the past year or so. [...]

The stock of his present company will drop still further. [...] The head man within the company will suffer a loss of power, although he may retain his title.

[...] This was a detailed psychological questionnaire that John had recently completed for his drug company, Searle. [...]

[...] But the main change in Philip’s condition with the company will not occur until after the inevitable reorganization.

[...] In your world, therefore, as Prentice-Hall is related to your joint experience; that is, to your experience and Ruburt’s, you form that company. This has nothing to do with that company as it is related to other people.

[...] The “burden” of that relationship rests upon you —again, both of you—upon your expectations and those beliefs about the world that you have projected upon that company. [...]

[...] This is a strong competitor without your company, or it is a strong physical competitor of yours within the same company. [...]

[...] There will also be an improving of company prestige, and this development hinges, believe it or not, one man who is at present considered relatively innocuous and unimportant. [...]

[...] He mentioned a Dave Gleason [not Jewish] in his company. [...]

(Seth’s predictions for Searle include the loss of power for the current vice president, who is the son of the company’s founder, although the son may retain a titular chair. [...] John, according to Seth, would be wise to remain with the company, for eventually things will work out well. Seth told John he could go as far as he desired in the company. [...]

(As John explained company politics to us now, he said he thought he saw a connection with Seth’s mention of an “apartment.” [...] Mr. McKeown, John said, had gone so far as to invite him up to his private room at the Sheraton-Hilton, for more secluded talks involving the company. At the time John was somewhat surprised that a high company official would pay particular attention to him. [...]

[...] The tall thin man also has a position high up in the company, John said. [...] He had a long talk with the company executive, but money was not the specific subject of the conversation.

[...] During break we discussed John’s company, Searle Drug, which is in the throes of financial difficulties compounded by management problems; Seth has discussed this often when John has been present, and to date his statements have been accurate.

There is something about a product that is overestimated, and legal difficulties that will be taken against the company, for which you have been asked or will be asked, to work.

([John:] “Another company I will work for?”)

([John:] “For a separate company?”)

(After the session Jane found herself giving some impressions on her own, again involving John and his company and related personnel. [...]

(See page 249 of the 313th session: Wherein a professional man not with John’s company offers John something.)

[...] In an intermediate position in the company. [...]

It does not seem to refer to business matters as far as the company is concerned. [...]

(Regarding the data on page 260: John said Seth’s description of an Andy Gump type fits a salesman in his company named John Winslow and that JW was present at the Rochester meeting three weeks ago, during which time the transformation took place in the features of John’s district supervisor. [...]

[...] The effort was cut short however by the arrival of company.

(The effect did not return after company left. [...]

[...] His job was not in jeopardy, but John was restless and needed changes; at the same time he felt he was not the stereotype personality his company demanded for district managers, which position would be the next step up for John in the drug company for which he worked. [...] 2 date, in the 63rd session, pertaining to his profession, and that Seth also briefly mentioned John and his company in the 54th session. [...]

[...] His value to his company is appreciated by his superiors, and in the meeting which will take place, his stand as an individual is his main hope of success.

[...] I am indeed no businessman as such, and yet I know that true value speaks for itself, as his value to the company is on record.

[...] His individuality and originality and determination actually represent his value to the company, and they know it.

(John Bradley was a witness to the session, and had some questions about his job with Searle, and events within the company. [...]

(John gave us much interesting background information about his company. [...]

[...] There will be two other men also of a like philosophy, and the four of you will exert considerable force within the company in the future, and will shape its policy eventually.

[...] He is another within the company whose ideas match your own to some degree.

(On Friday, June 21, 1968, Jane sent the manuscript of her dream book to Parker Publishing Company Inc., Village Square Building, West Nyack, N Y. On Saturday, June 28, a card arrived from Parker with this message:

[...] She was in the company of two young women, one of whom lives in the apartment beneath us.

[...] While some utility companies in the United States are in trouble with their nuclear plants, then, other companies do own plants that perform very well and very economically. [...] Those companies are to be congratulated. [...]

[...] In May the group recommended scientifically acceptable alternatives, but it now appears unlikely that either the company owning TMI or the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission will adopt any of them—and so the arguments continue. [...]

(Humorously:) But you should issue only se-lec-tive invitations, and be careful of the company you keep.

I should emphasize that it would be better for you not to play with tables at all, except here or in the company of others who are already familiar with such work.

[...] He felt that you would go along, but on your own would prefer no company. [...] He felt proud of himself, at ease with the company, and he spoke of matters he considered important. [...]

The event with your company (Bumbalos), however, points rather dramatically toward important changes in Ruburt’s mental patterns, and he has had reminiscent experiences since. [...]

They will also publish my book, though by then there will be some changes in the company, and eventually our friend Aerofranz will change his allegiance to another company.

I am in fine company. [...]

[...] John sells for a drug company.)

(Here Seth refers to the copies of sessions concerning John and his company, Searle, that John has carefully kept. [...]

[...] “I just got the feeling that you and I are going to have some unexpected company—I don’t know whether here or at the house.” [...] However, her statement prompted me to tell her that a few days before the insurance company had denied our claim for major medical benefits because they hadn’t received the hospital records, I’d waked up early one morning and lay there worrying about the possibility of a denial for perhaps an hour. [...]

[...] I told the kids that they could lose their shirts in their proposed Seth Production Company, just so they would know various possibilities—and probabilities.)

[...] However, the copies were so poor—and lacking lab reports—that Janet said she’d have them redone; now I’m to stop in a couple of days from now—which means the records don’t go to the insurance company before then, either. [...]

[...] I did ask if he knew whether the company is paying 80% or 100%, and he didn’t know. [...]

[...] This in turn had reminded me of my dream of months ago, when from the elevator tower of the hospital I’d looked out a window to see checks from the insurance company lying on the asphalt at the side of the left front wheel of the car. [...]

It was a weekend that we had company. [...]

[...] We had company. [...]

[...] I was balanced on the arm of our davenport, talking to our company. [...]

Later, after our company left, the sensation came back yet again as I stood in the kitchen talking to Jane. [...]