1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:686 AND stemmed:environ)

UR1 Section 1: Session 686 February 27, 1974 5/76 (7%) neurological selectivity carriage pulses corporal
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 1: You and the “Unknown” Reality
– Session 686: Man’s Early Consciousness and the Birth of Memory. Selectivity, Specialization, and “Official” Reality
– Session 686 February 27, 1974 9:45 P.M. Wednesday

[... 24 paragraphs ...]

(Pause at 10:37.) Its focus in the present is now secure. That focus finally brought about, in your terms, an expansion of consciousness, and one that early man did not have to handle. In your terms, time now includes more space, and hence more experience and stimuli. Again speaking historically, in the past the private person in any given hour was aware at once only of those events happening in his immediate environment. He could respond instantly. Events were, to that extent now, manageable. And rest your hand if you want to.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

(Slowly:) In a world in which individuals were confined in space in a tribe or clan (a one-minute pause), action was immediate. The environment presented a framework in which consciousness learned to deal with stimuli in a direct fashion. It learned how to focus. The necessary specialization meant that only so much data could be handled at once, emotionally or otherwise. The formation of different tribes allowed man to behave cooperatively, in small numbers. This meant that those on the outside were selectively ignored, considered strangers.

[... 16 paragraphs ...]

The child was himself in the past on the one hand, and yet he was a probable future self in that past. (Pause.) From the standpoint of Ruburt’s official mental focus, and from the standpoint of the neurologically accepted present, that past environment had to remain off-center, or blurred. He could experience it only by sidestepping officially accepted neurological activity. He visited a store that is not at that location “anymore,” and here the sense data were somewhat clearer. He had no conscious memories of the store’s interior, yet it was instantly apparent to him — the dark oiled floor, spread with sawdust. Even the odors were present.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

He went from place to place, floating bodiless — a tour of consciousness. That same environment exists now, alternately with Ruburt’s present, and as vividly as his present does. It was, however, from his viewpoint, a probable past.4

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

The school and the store were not in the infant’s experience, for in that probability the family moved away. The blur of activity earlier was the result of neurological confusion, and Ruburt switched over unknowingly to an environment still in the same physical block that was meaningful to him, but not shared by the future experience of that infant. You must understand that your own past exists as vitally as does your present — but your probable pasts and presents exist in the same manner. You simply do not accept them in the strands of experience that “you” recognize.5

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR1 Appendix 5: (For Session 686) appendix neurological leap messages vocabulary
UR1 Appendix 4: (For Session 685) sidepools neurological bypass Saratoga linear
UR1 Section 1: Session 685 February 25, 1974 Preface network selectivity desultorily ostensibly
UR1 Section 1: Session 687 March 4, 1974 probable neurological shadowy geese race