1 result for (book:ss AND session:568 AND (stemmed:"good evil" OR stemmed:"evil good") AND (stemmed:man OR stemmed:men OR stemmed:human))

SS Part Two: Chapter 17: Session 568, February 22, 1971 16/55 (29%) Speakers devil evil soul religions
– Seth Speaks: The Eternal Validity of the Soul
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Part Two
– Chapter 17: Probabilities, the Nature of Good and Evil, and Religious Symbolism
– Session 568, February 22, 1971, 9:19 P.M. Monday

PROBABILITIES, THE NATURE OF GOOD AND
EVIL, AND RELIGIOUS SYMBOLISM

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Good evening.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The chapter heading: “Probabilities, the Nature of Good and Evil, and Religious Symbolism.”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Development is therefore considered in a one-line direction only, in Christian terms. Seldom, for example, is it thought of in horizontal terms. The idea of evolution in its popular meaning promulgated this theory, as through gradual progression in a one-line direction, man emerged from the ape. (Humorously): Christ could just as well have disappeared sideways.

(Pause at 9:26.) The inner reality of the message was told in terms that man at the time could understand, in line with his root assumptions. Development unfolds in all directions. The soul is not ascending a series of stairs, each one representing a new and higher point of development.

Instead, the soul stands at the center of itself, exploring, extending its capacities in all directions at once, involved in issues of creativity, each one highly legitimate. The probable system of reality opens up the nature of the soul to you. It should change current religion’s ideas considerably. For this reason, the nature of good and evil is a highly important point.

(9:30.) On the one hand, quite simply and in a way that you cannot presently understand, evil does not exist. However, you are obviously confronted with what seem to be quite evil effects. Now it has been said often that there is a god, so there must be a devil — or if there is good, there must be evil. This is like saying that because an apple has a top, it must have a bottom — but without any understanding of the fact that both are a portion of the apple. (Pause; one of many.)

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Now those who have such beliefs actually lack a necessary deep trust in the nature of consciousness, of the soul, and of All That Is. They concentrate upon not what they think of as the power of good, but fearfully upon what they think of as the power of evil.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Some very old religions understood the hallucinatory nature of the devil concept, but even in Egyptian times, the simpler and more distorted ideas became prevalent, particularly with the masses of people. In some ways, men in those times could not understand the concept of a god without the concept of a devil.

Storms, for example, are highly creative natural events, though they can also cause destruction. Early man could see only the destruction. Some intuitively understood that any effects are creative, despite their appearances, but few could convince their fellow men.

(Pause at 9:47.) The light-and-darkness contrast presents us with the same kind of picture. The good was seen as light, for men felt safer in the day. The evil was therefore assigned to nightfall. Within the mass of distortions, however, hidden beneath the dogma there was always a hint of the basic creativity of every effect.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(9:54. Jane’s trance had been good. Her delivery had picked up considerably. And of course I’ve often seen her respond to this infusion of energy and liveliness, seemingly from a source beyond Jane as I know her. If anything, her transformation is more pronounced when she’s not at her best before a session begins…. Resume at 10:07.)

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(10:28.) The methods, the secret methods behind all of the religions, were meant to lead man into a realm of understanding that existed apart from the symbols and the stories, into inner realizations that would take him both within and without the physical world that he knew. There are many manuscripts still not discovered, from old monasteries particularly in Spain, that tell of underground groups within religious orders who kept these secrets alive when other monks were copying old Latin manuscripts.

There were tribes who never learned to write in Africa and Australia who also knew these secrets, and men called “Speakers” who memorized them and spread them upward, even throughout northern portions of Europe, before the time of Christ.

[... 19 paragraphs ...]

I was indeed. There were two others that you know of. The one mentioned in class material (in the 558th session), and the other yourself. (This was a distinct surprise to me.) Now the Speakers themselves in the reincarnational process can also use or not use their abilities in any given life, or be aware of them. I bid you a fond good evening.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

SS Part Two: Chapter 17: Session 569, February 24, 1971 Speakers dreamers eeg rules foods
NoPR Part Two: Chapter 13: Session 653, April 4, 1973 Monroe massive inside eagle Speakers
SS Part Two: Chapter 20: Session 578, April 5, 1971 Speakers ten training number Christ
SS Part Two: Chapter 18: Session 571, March 3, 1971 symbols stages joy reverie signposts