“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I am not sure. I am thinking in terms of family connections. [...]

(“I am not sure. I am thinking in terms of family connections. [...]

You can intellectually understand what I am telling you, but the brain (shaking head) cannot experience reality directly. [...]

[...] As I sit at my drawing board at the office, perhaps a foot or eighteen inches from the begonia plant which served as a model for the envelope object, I am given my paycheck each Friday afternoon.

(“I had two illegitimate children [class laughter], a mistress that sneaked into my private study, a magician that I kept in case I did not do too well on my own, a housekeeper who was pregnant every year that I had her, and three daughters who joined a nunnery because I would not have them — and I am referred to in barely three paltry lines, for my reign did not last very long.

[...] But as I now recall them, without directly checking on our friend the Pope, who has, you must understand, gone his own way, I am coming as close as I can. [...]

[...] While what I am once seemed to be contained within those personalities, I was but the seed for them. [...]

[...] Those personalities are not locked up inside of what I am, however. [...]

I will speak briefly so that you will know that I am here. [...]

[...] While I am certainly not one given to humility, nevertheless your smugness is truly astronomical.

I am not going to hold a long session. [...]

I am pleased that Mark is following my suggestions. [...]

[...] I certainly would not want to get him angry at me, as I am so familiar with his explosive reactions.

[...] Now you will see what I am saying. [...]

[...] And now, my dear patient Joseph, may I tell you also that you are part of that same entity; and this is one of the main reasons why I am able to communicate with you both.

I have been blocked by Ruburt on these points for so long that I am completely amazed that he deigns to let me through tonight.

[...] January 4, Monday, 11:30 AM: No results in particular.

We will only concern ourselves with a few, those of which I am at least partially familiar. [...]

I am myself, now, to a large extent so freed. [...]

This has been a fruitful session, and I am pleased to find us back on schedule. [...]

[...] I am doing very well with him, however, and your two guests are doing very well themselves, considering the circumstances.

[...] I am not clear on all of this. [...]

(February 1, Monday, 11:30 AM: I heard voices but forgot most of them. [...]

(February 8, Monday, 11:30 AM: Good state achieved. [...]

[...] It would help when he is working, particularly whenever he is unduly bothered, to stop and say “What do I think about what I am doing in this moment? [...]

[...] I am hinting here of connections with astrology, though certainly not with the astrology currently known.

[...] I am not speaking, you understand, of any kind of predetermination, but of temperamental tendencies used differently by each individual. [...]

[...] I am well aware however of your attitudes in the time, as you experience it. [...]

Be at rest, and if you understand what I am saying you will cease pressing. [...]

Now I am shortly going to close my session, but I have a few words for you. [...]

Now I am going to close our session so that our Lady of Florence and our Alison, over here, can view the premier pictures. [...]

I am speaking of the past. [...]

AM & afternoon: Finish chapter 2 James—“proofread” it.

11 AM–12:30: (Sheri calls about New York Post centerfold.)

(Amused:) I try to give you the heading for the next chapter even at the end of a session, so that Ruburt knows what I am doing. [...]

I may or may not return, according to those rhythms of which I speak, but know that I am present and approachable.

[...] As you know, or have suspected, I am indeed adding book dictation — at our own pace, considering the circumstances. [...]

I am having some few difficulties here, with our balky Ruburt, but I presume we can handle it.

[...] I am trying to make it plain here that the range of action is what is important. [...]

[...] I want you to keep the difference between the two frameworks in mind, however, in line with what I am saying.

In the terms in which I am speaking here and tonight, it is a delusion to believe that you should be other than you are in any important manners. [...]

[...] I am not very well acquainted with these, however, and cannot speak of them with any great familiarity.

[...] If I am aware of communicating now through Ruburt, in different ways each of you telepathically communicates to and through other personalities, though with little knowledge of your accomplishment.

[...] But I am not in voice for it.

[...] I am stating simply what I see.

[...] I am aware of the work done on the book so far, and find that it is indeed quite remarkable.

[...] For this reason I wanted to discuss it this evening, and because his energies were momentarily depleted I am holding a rather short session.

[...] You might say that it becomes the subconscious, although I am speaking now simply to get the idea across, and this is not precisely the case.

[...] I am speaking now of the psychological makeup of the survival personality. [...]

(Long pause.) I am simply giving you a moment in case you think of any more important questions.

I am speaking now of Leonard. [...] I am trying to give you some insight into how a seemingly trivial event takes place, how telepathy and expectation enter in. [...]

Now I am giving you an apartment-by-apartment version simply to make my point. [...]

I am relatively, in your terms, unemotional at my own level of activity. [...]

[...] “Wow—am I out....”

(12:07 AM. [...]

I am taking this incident as an example, but my remarks are to you both, for you both have much room for improvement in this respect. It is true that I am not concerned directly, so you may think that it is easy for me to speak to you both in this way. However it is because I am not directly concerned that I can see the problem and point out ways in which it can be solved. [...]

[...] And I am speaking here only of one individual, but such reactions are also picked up by others on a subconscious basis, and the circle can be a vicious one.

You both know this I am sure, as a rule you both do fairly well in following a more healthy procedure. [...]

[...] I am not speaking of indiscriminate Pollyanna hogwash, and yet even that is more practical in the long run than any habitual concentration upon disturbances.