“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

([Sue:] “Can one entity have two personalities at once in this system of reincarnation?”)

([Nadine.) “Would it be possible, like, to have a husband and wife that were, when they were gotten together, you would have a great person with opposite personalities, could they possibly be two probable selves?”)

[...] Since we occupy two apartments in order to have enough living and working space, we had room to take in a couple who had been flooded out. [...]

[...] And so, like Seth Speaks, this is really two books in one: It’s not only about the nature of personal reality, but the circumstances surrounding Jane’s production of the material and the many ideas she has concerning it.

(Two sessions have been held since our return home — to answer questions and handle other matters raised by the tour. [...]

[...] You are working on two main problems, but both involve the sacredness of the individual, and the individual’s relationship with others and with all physically oriented consciousness.

(We have two compositions, both of them by Jane, to add to this session. [...]

[...] Here she referred to a number of out-of-state calls she’d taken after supper this evening, she’d found two of them in particular to be rather upsetting.

[...] I can now massage the thigh and calf of her broken leg in a way impossible to do even last week, and I can feel changes taking place in that more immobile leg of the two. [...]

(Because of his particular disposition, Rooney had furnished ideal companionship for our other cat, Willy, who is several years older, and Jane and I had often speculated about the special relationship between the two. [...]

(The state appeared to be progressing slowly, as in the above two instances. [...]

[...] We have achieved a situation beneficial to all—for Jane’s will and my own each declares that upon the death of the survivor of the two of us, our estate is to be donated to the Manuscripts and Archives division of Yale University Library, in New Haven, Connecticut. [...]

[...] You do this simply because you are afraid of standing on your own two feet, figuratively speaking. [...]

[...] He still feels badly because he does not have your card, but your card will be two books.

There are points of correlation between the two of which the conscious brain is not aware, and perceptions that do not consciously register. [...]

[...] And if all of you will listen, in your own way, you can apply what I am about to say to yourselves though for right now I am addressing these two (Sue and Juanita). [...]

(The last two sessions are highly interesting, but weren’t devoted to book dictation. [...]

[...] Here again we have two clear purposes, but they oppose each other.

(We had two questions for Seth, since we’re trying to get into the habit of writing such down as they occur to us: 1. Jane wanted Seth to comment on why he’ll take off on something she’s read, and reinterpret it his own way, or carry it further; her question came up because he did this Monday while she’s reading Fred Hoyle’s book, Ten Faces of The Universe; 2. Jane wanted Seth to give information on her “significant” dream of last Saturday morning, July 1. She couldn’t remember any details from it, but has talked about it often; she thinks it had something to do with health.)

[...] Later, I had a brief glimpse from directly overhead of two men descending into an outside cellarway attached to a house. [...]

[...] Two closed doors separated us. [...]

However, instead of our glasses, please consider a very simple situation: the two of you in this room. [...]

[...] As it happens, the eye she uses to see with is much the poorer of the two.

[...] Nevertheless, I did feel a legitimate welcome in advance; and since I feel already as if I know very well two of the present gathering, and since furthermore we have dealt with them in our material, I am more than willing to greet both of them personally.

—he knows this, and he knows that by enduring the small acts of cruelty he gains two ends.

[...] John had two questions for Seth—one concerning himself, and one about a pet dog that had recently been killed. [...]

[...] No one wanted the dog killed, but it was not coincidence that you yourself loosened the dog’s collar, or that your wife was the one who left the dog; for symbolically the two of you were connected here. [...]

[...] Two weeks would really not be detrimental, but you do not really need that much, and so I see no reason for taking it.