“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You would use it, the two of you, as a measuring yardstick: if he began to improve considerably enough, particularly a few years ago, you would instantly, Joseph, become negative and guarded. [...] After all, the two of you rode horses at the head of the pack.

[...] The tenants at 458 at one time formed a kind of family, and to some extent that relationship continues, as far as the two of you are concerned, with Ann and Leonard. [...]

[...] You also played down your own leadership role, while of course maintaining it, and the two of you operate as a team now as you did then.

[...] When the two of you took up together for the reasons given, you decided upon a further handicap, though you had not specifically chosen one.

(I would now like to describe two effects, one of Jane’s and one of mine, that took place almost simultaneously some few minutes before the session began. [...]

[...] The effect was still there, she said; it lasted for perhaps two minutes, until just before session time at 9.

[...] The consciousness belongs to the spirit then, but the two are not the same. [...]

[...] In the last paragraph, I had a bit of difficulty spelling just two words. [...]

“Here Seth seemed to telescope the two events into one, “Jane wrote, “or refer to them together, as if the distinction didn’t exist for him…. Seth may be implying that the ascension was the main issue in the Christ story, rather than the resurrection, or telling us that the two events are so intertwined thematically as to be treated as one.” [...]

[...] Yet in Acts, Luke postulates the 40-day interval between the two events. (Originally Luke composed his Gospel and Acts as one treatise; the two were separated early in the second century.) Out of such contradictions as those implied in Luke’s case, however, confusion and opposing opinions reign when one studies the Gospels and related material. [...]

[...] But I do know my attitude about getting such a book has improved a lot in the last year or two.”

(Seth did not mention two envelopes, although Jane said she knew there were two involved. [...]

These two factors are extremely important. [...]

We are dealing here with something rather unusual, in that we are attempting to permit two personalities to exist side by side, so to speak. [...]

[...] And such experiments will be helpful in that the various layers of the two personalities, Ruburt’s and my own, will be seen in their operating procedures.

[...] I removed it before enclosing the object between two pieces of Bristol, then sealing the sandwich in the usual double envelopes.

[...] These are two faces of the same coin.

[...] But two houses will never appear.

[...] The connection between the two being the fact that the object concerned a phone call to us from my mother; and that my mother was also the sender of the card to us.

[...] We played the two tapes—Jane was especially interested in the chant that preceded the Sumari’s short speech—until 9:20. [...]

Two things were involved: a certain evolution of your abilities, using the eye phenomena. [...]

Now, the energy that was here last night became suspended for a time between the two apartments so that there was a give-and-take. [...]

[...] Because of the circumstances, however, and the two family deaths, the information was available, and used to remind all the class members of the different kind of familyship, a different kind of endeavor, and to offer a different kind of assurance and bonds that are not destroyed in your terms by any amount of reincarnation or any amount of time you use them.

[...] Jane brought in two slices of pizza—so I forgot to bring them home with me at 7:05 PM tonight.... [...]

[...] At 3:30 she started to read the session material from the last two days, but had considerable trouble doing so. [...]

Ruburt makes his verbal knowledge available for our use, and quite automatically the two of us together cause the various words that will be spoken. [...]

[...] But overall Jane’s pace was faster and more confident than in the first two sessions dealing with Seth’s book. [...]

[...] A couple of weeks previously a check for some $3700 had arrived; the two go together to make one payment as billed by the hospital to the insurance company. [...]

[...] That realization will help change conditions enough so that the two of you can be home together sooner than you may think possible. [...]

[...] In such cases you have two cross-purposes operating — the desire to express oneself, and the fear of doing so.

[...] Such individuals may try “to get ahead” on the one hand, in society or business or in the arts or sciences, only to find themselves taking two steps backward for every step they take forward. [...]

[...] This has to do with a brief conversation the two of you held recently. [...]

When you see Ruburt going too far in one direction, and see him trying to alter that direction, you can indeed exert your energy, leadership and direction there, for the two of you also operate jointly as well as individually. [...]

[...] In any case the two of you are needed, as I mentioned earlier. [...]

[...] If you’re good, you two, and if you will either borrow a recorder or dispense with notes or some such, we will have a good old informal time of it, though not of course like Denmark. [...]

You are such fun, you two. [...]

There, you two chickadees, good night for now. [...]

[...] Handing her the two envelopes and the two pieces of Bristol, I had asked her to pick a test object, seal it up, and give it to me the next time we saw her, without telling me what the test object was. [...]

[...] The rest was our longest since the sessions began two years ago, and did us both much good. [...]

Two of these statements may appear at first glance to contradict themselves, but you shall shortly see that they do not, and you are left for now with a pretty question: for does the self, or identity, then form the perceptive dimension in which it exists, or is it created by the dimension?

This has to do with two separate principles. [...]

[...] However, with that fine stubbornness I mentioned in the first essay, Jane never told Marie of her own affliction; since the two no longer saw each other, consciously Marie never knew. [...] I even think that mother and daughter shared the same case of arthritis—there weren’t two separate instances of it.

[...] They were divorced in 1931, when Jane was two years old. [...]

[...] Or in Framework 2 the two of them could have cooperated upon such a decision before Marie’s birth, even. [...]

[...] When did the two of us make our own pacts in Framework 2 (or other frameworks), and how will they work out in Framework 1? [...]

[...] (Half humorously.) At the same time that these sexual feelings operated, the two of you have an extremely powerful psychic bond, and a hidden but definite sense of inner identity.

[...] So you have been constantly between the two poles.

[...] You both become panicky therefore in two main areas—both that would affect your primary directives, to devote yourselves to artistic and psychic work.

Now you feel more actively threatened when the two of you reach the opposite end of closeness and contact, where you feel that despite all your precautions pregnancy might result. [...]

[...] I made two pencil drawings of the image. [...]

[...] I came across the calendar beneath a stack of books and on the spur of the moment decided to use it for the test, wondering whether this type of cut and dried subject matter would have as much emotional pull for Seth/Jane as the subject matter of the first two tests. [...]

[...] Her eyes closed at times for a sentence or two. [...]

[...] Something to do with two people, and a yard. [...]

[...] An initial, an area of color, window shapes having to do with two people, but connected with several circumstances, and with a package, perhaps sent from this address.

[...] The three people were a Mr. Connor, who Bill definitely did not expect to see, and his two children.

(While Bill Gallagher was putting on his hat and coat at 10 PM tonight, preparatory to leaving our apartment for the bus terminal, I wrote down two impressions of headlines. [...]

[...] Bill said the description fits the stereotyper at the newspaper, and that the two of them discussed the ad this evening. [...]

[...] I don’t believe that there can be any single answer or blanket explanation, but we have had two readings involving such children, and I can give you the explanations offered in these specific instances.

[...] You [Jim] were also involved with him in two past lives in the same relationship, and as priests you both were interested in the inner workings of the universe.”

[...] “They result from your two priestly existences where you were both highly involved with calculations having to do with movement of the planets.”

[...] Again, a phone call was involved, this time from a man I’ll call Jon who called me from another part of the country, right after my first book was published two years ago. [...]

—and we will begin part two of this evening’s session. [...] The two of you, now, chose that aspect of your lives together in this life, to help you understand the meaningful relationship between spontaneity as connected with the emotions and creativity, and discipline as connected with the intellectual: to feel and understand the creative tension that connects them both, to learn the personal aspects of emotional relationships as they affect others, and the reflection of the emotions into creative endeavor. [...]

[...] It is happening now, not two thousand years ago. [...]

[...] She couldn’t get the material through in the two instances noted; in the past, she said, she wouldn’t have been aware of this, so she considered this new awareness an advancement over the past.

The two sessions have wearied him some, but will overall be highly advantageous.

The two sessions, one immediately following the other, you see—both should be highly beneficial however.