“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(When Jane did go into trance her Seth voice was again deeper than her usual voice, but not at all loud so as to attract attention. [...]

[...] Seth.”)

(“Thank you very much, Seth.” [...]

(I explained to Jane how much I appreciated Seth’s insight about the drugs. [...]

(“Seth was right,” Jane said with a smile as soon as I gave her the news. [...]

(Jane’s Seth voice was good, with pauses.)

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)

(Seth was almost amused and understanding at once. [...]

(Seth’s entity, who is nameless in our terms, spoke this evening, rather than Seth. [...] Seth’s entity hasn’t spoken many times; the 464th session and earlier ones contain detailed notes as to the manner of speaking used by the entity, etc.

(At 9:09 Jane told me that for the first time in a long time she felt like “the other personality,” meaning Seth’s entity. [...]

[...] The voice was very high, thin, formal, quite distant, and quite faint when contrasted against Seth’s delivery. [...]

[...] But she went on: “Now let me get a couple of paragraphs on the chapter… The heading is: ‘Your Dreaming Psyche Is Awake.’” Then Seth came through at once:)

(“Thank you, Seth. [...]

(Before Seth finished dictating Chapter Two, Jane got from him mentally the heading for Chapter One, and inserted it into this manuscript.)

What Seth is saying here is that the inner self uses this sense to initiate the birth of one of its personalities in physical life. [...]

[...] Seth spoke about some of the benefits in the recorded session he gave for the college psychology class. [...]

What Seth is alluding to is that the practice of Psy-Time does stretch normal consciousness. [...]

[...] Through instructions given by Seth I’ve learned to come fully awake while dreaming, as mentioned earlier. [...]

[...] Those gorgeous children struck home with me for many reasons — partly because of Seth’s material, and partly because I think at my own age [65] I’ve come to appreciate more and more the truly creative act that being a parent is. [...] I wouldn’t mind Seth commenting on my own evolving views of parenthood sometime.

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)

[...] It also reminds me of something Seth said many years ago — that when Jane passionately wanted to get rid of the symptoms, she would do so. [...]

(When I read this session to her, I was struck again by Seth’s use of the word “blindness,” and Jane admitted that she’d been worrying about losing her sight because of her eye difficulty. [...] I’d been surprised today when Seth had said that things were going ahead full steam.

(“Good afternoon, Seth.”)

[...] I noted that it was now conceded by both Jane and Seth that she did have a cold, as I’d asked her yesterday.

[...] I then wondered aloud at the apparent suddenness of the breakup of symptoms, just three days after my pendulum session of last Sunday, and two days after the session with Seth on Monday, November 6. This brought Seth back at once.)

(Today while relaxing, Jane received two impressions, both somewhat worrisome, that we hoped Seth would cover tonight.

[...] We wanted Seth to discuss this also.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(It will be recalled that in the 185th session Seth gave me some tips on how to help my hay fever through suggestion upon retiring at night. [...] I had been using suggestion at various times through the day; trying Seth’s method, I noticed an amazing improvement at once. [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(“Good night, Seth.”

[...] Seth said no more about the results of the test, and in view of Jane’s state I thought it best not to query him about it tonight.

[...] As soon as Seth mentioned it, I immediately saw a distinct resemblance between Emma Martin, as she had been, and the young girl Pat. [...] Consciously I had made no such connection however, before Seth mentioned it, but had sensed something familiar about Pat Friday evening.

(“Good evening, Seth.”

[...] Recently I have been using suggestion rather successfully on hay fever, following Seth’s ideas. [...]

[...] Any such episode as described by Seth above would have taken place probably more than 40 years ago. [...]

(And here I must admit that although Seth gave the entity name for Bill’s wife Ida, I did not think quickly enough to ask for the entity name of Ida’s twin sister. Jane and I are curious to see if there is any similarity in entity names under such circumstances, and I will make it a point to ask Seth for the name.)

[...] She said my sneezing did not bother her, that Seth was willing to wait; but also that Seth probably called the break early because of my continued sneezing.

[...] It might be added here that at the time of the visit of Jane’s father, on the night in question Jane had, as she was explaining some of the Seth material to her father and Midge, felt definite emotional “nudges” from Seth to hold a session, whereas upon the occasion of our visit with Bill and Ida in Rochester, she had not. [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(This is a different thing than Seth being available say at 8 AM, or noon, or other capricious hours we may choose. [...] We do know however that Seth would be available at any time under emotional stress, if we asked.)

(For a while now Jane and I have been considering the question, aloud, of Seth’s availability to us whenever we choose to hold a session. [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] When Jane and I wonder about Seth’s seeming availability, we mean the scheduled Monday and Wednesday evening sessions, an occasional appearance at one of Jane’s ESP classes, and an occasional dropping in at an unscheduled session, perhaps on a weekend, etc.

[...] At the same time I was thinking over Seth’s material in this session so far. I remarked to Jane that if we paid attention to that material, then instead of turning away the people who would be influenced by the newspaper notice, we might be able to influence some of them to buy Seth/Jane’s books.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] I did think that practically all of our unannounced visitors were young people because the Seth material attracted them much more easily than older generations. [...]

[...] A few moments later, when he came through Seth took up where he’d left off in mid-sentence:)

(We expected Seth to speak tonight, and to deal with material Jane and I had been discussing just before session time. [...] Seth plunged in, in a most animated way, without preliminary greeting. [...]

[...] Jane did not respond, sitting quietly, so after a short pause I said good night to Seth on the assumption that the session was over. But she then resumed as Seth.)

(“Yes, Seth.”)

[...] Jane, as Seth, leaned forward, intent and amused.)

[...] As Seth had promised, it was a good chapter. [...] She would still be in trance, she said, and even speaking, but Seth would wait. [...]

(11:57 P.M. Seth referred to Jane’s ESP class. [...] And it can be added that Seth was in great form this evening, too.)

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] After listening for a bit, Jane asked me not to pursue this subject now; she suggested I ask these questions at the end of the chapter, if Seth hadn’t volunteered the answers before then. [...]

(Before the session we discussed the one séance we’ve ever tried, and which is described in Chapter 3 of The Seth Material. I said that the spectacular results obtained had seemed to come straight out of Framework 2. We also discussed the long essay on early man in Time for November 7, and I remarked that I’d like to ask Seth some questions about the state of our present “knowledge” about our heritage.

(Jane had no special questions, beyond saying she hoped Seth would continue with material on Frameworks 1 and 2. She was very relaxed, and expressed qualifications about having s session; she did want to try, though.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(“Okay, Seth. [...]

[...] There was a little more here, spoken at a fast pace, to the effect that Seth wanted us to get the recorder fixed so that we could have a session without my taking notes for a change. Seth suggested that Jane or Sue Watkins could transcribe the notes, etc., while I commented that it would be quite a job, etc.)

[...] Then I told Seth I was ready to resume.)

(“Thank you, Seth. [...]

[...] She said that at the end Seth had another remark to make, but that she didn’t have the energy to get it out: “And thank you for fixing my chair.” [...]

(As usual, Seth’s observations about painting are excellent; I’ve said this many times before. Nor have I ever heard Jane discuss painting in Seth’s manner. [...]

[...] Her pace was quite rapid — as fast as it’s been, I believe, since Seth started his book. [...]

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(Here, unexpectedly, Seth referred to a large portrait I’ve been working on for the last month and the one that gave me so much trouble today. [...]

(On January 23 I mailed to our publisher Jane’s Introduction for Sue Watkins’s Conversations With Seth.

I told Jane she needn’t have a session if she wanted to paint, but that if she did go into trance I wouldn’t mind getting something from Seth on the dream I’d had early this morning. [...]

[...] Seth returned at 10:10—and he did discuss my dream until he said good night at 10:30 P.M.)

[...] All of that material has a general appeal, however, and I wish I could show in a few words the variety and depth of Seth’s information.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

[...] She said that while speaking as Seth about me, she saw me, within, seated at a table or desk in the front upstairs bedroom of my parents’ home in Sayre, Pennsylvania. [...]

[...] Seth was not involved. [...]

(I thought this a neat bit of telepathic exchange, for as I asked Seth the question, I expected to receive just that kind of answer. [...]