“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The last line in the poem he had completed just before dinner spoke of a light that would illuminate both worlds, one of the soul and one of the flesh. [...]

that would unite our double-

Give us a moment… The cat would have died that winter. [...]

[...] If Ruburt’s mother had been unable to bear a child, then Ruburt would have had a different mother and a different background, granting that Ruburt had come alive.

[...] He does not realize, however, nor do your other psychologists, what I have told you often—that there is an inner ego; and it is this inner ego that organizes what Jung would call unconscious material.

Now: the inner ego is the organizer of experience that Jung would call unconscious. [...]

There are several points I would like to make concerning our own envelope experiments.

[...] Your physical root assumptions in this case would be so strong that you could not imagine yourself, even in a dream, without a physical body. [...]

[...] Tam told her recently the book would be out in May. [...]

[...] Part of your accomplishment lies in our sessions and your own considerable work with the notes, and with the invisible aura contained in those notes, for there in a different way you are painting a portrait—a portrait of two lives from a highly individualistic standpoint, extremely unique—and that is the kind of experience that would be ripped out of your life’s fabric, were you the hypothetical idealized version with whom you sometimes relate—a version highly romanticized, let me add. [...]

[...] For the personality knows full well the tremendous force of its own energy potential, and it would be literally disastrous for one portion to go ahead at the expense of the other. [...]

[...] Some realization has come to the overly conscientious self, even before last night’s session, or the session itself would have been much more difficult.

(“It would be really frustrating, waiting, except that everything seems so timeless,” Jane said as we continued to sit. [...]

[...] Those interactions exist about you all the while, and I would like you in your thoughts to aspire toward them, to try to stretch your perceptions enough so that you become at least somewhat aware of their existence.

(Last week we received Dr. Instream’s letter of September 13, in which he wrote that he would like to try straight clairvoyant communication with Seth on Monday and Wednesday nights at 10 PM. [...]

(Dr. Instream would like us to ask Seth why he stopped at York Beach, since he had never been there before. [...]

(Five items could be the station wagon, a cup of coffee, a pile of bricks, paint-stained khakis, and the world itself; but this is open to other interpretations, we would say. [...]

[...] or that people will or would stop buying the books.... [...]

Your ideas about mail are excellent, and could not come until each of you had some faith in others, for before you would not trust mail to class.

[...] Otherwise you would not understand what I am trying to say.

[...] If I did talk to her, it would be in the dream state when she is not a child. [...]

He purposely went to a store (Elmira Discount) where he would not find clothes.... [...]

[...] If you recognized the power of your own being, you would know that it ever seeks greater realms of creativity and experience, in which new challenges are inherent — for all problems are challenges.

[...] Today’s question was simple enough—but I wanted to know what would be different at the house when she returned home this time, compared to the situation at the house before she went into the hospital. [...]

[...] I said I hoped Seth would go into my question of yesterday, about not wanting my own suggestions for Jane’s improvement to come into conflict with her body’s own innate and spontaneous order of healing itself. [...]

[...] “I’ve been wondering when people would start noticing something,” I said. [...]

[...] It would be quite improbable for you, Joseph (as Seth calls me), to suddenly turn into a tailor, for example, for none of your choices with probabilities have led toward such an action.

(Long pause.) I am taking my time here, for there are some issues that I would like to clear up, that are difficult to explain.

[...] At 9:15, as we sat waiting, she had her first intimation from Seth that a session would actually take place. [...]

[...] For example, without the peculiar spark set off through the interrelationship existing between the inner self and the physical being, the dream world would not exist. [...]

I mentioned this and read my small script to class at our next meeting, adding that I thought further instructions would have been given if the session had not been cut short. [...]

[...] In the last class, Seth had told the students that he would help those who were ready to project. [...]

The affair is also a lesson to you when you think negatively, showing you the results of such negative thoughts, followed without letup — and, in fact, followed in spite of redeeming actions that would change events. [...]

To a large extent, you see, you and Ruburt were also responsible for the contact, for were it not for your own present experiences, your relationship with me and your friendship with the girl [Sue], the help would not have been given to these probable selves of yours. [...]

[...] He had changed jobs and left Elmira at the time we were interested in his house, in June 1964, however. Seth dealt with the purchase of this house in several sessions, saying it would be a good one for us psychically. [...]

[...] Perhaps the ring came from a shop somewhere about this location, or events began here at this affair which would end up with the giving of the ring. [...]

[...] The idea in choosing it was to simulate a test in which an object chosen by a third party was used; then this third party would interpret the data, leaving Jane and me free, so to speak. [...]

[...] Some of da Vinci’s sketches already show that tendency, and he is fascinating because with his undeniable artistic tendencies he also began to show those tendencies that would lead toward the birth of modern science.

[...] He combined the forces of highly original, strong imagination with very calculated preciseness, a kind of preciseness that would lead to detailed sketches of flowers, trees, the action of water—all of nature’s phenomena.

I did mean to mention that man’s use of perspective in painting was a turning point (early in the 15th century), in that it foreshadowed the turning of art away from its imaginative colorations toward a more specific physical rendering—that is, to a large degree after that the play of the imagination would not be allowed to “distort” the physical frame of reference.