“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The situation was common knowledge, so no confidences are violated to say that at the time Roy was keeping company with a woman who was separated from her husband, but not divorced. [...] The woman’s husband returned to Elmira last summer, however.

[...] She states that the material at the beginning of the Dr. Instream test data, on page 113, applies to a cocktail party she attended in Washington on Monday, December 6. Peggy states Seth’s description here of the cocktail party is quite correct, even to the fact that a woman was the main hostess, and that a man, her husband, was present with her. [...]

As of now they are not married, and the woman is giving more than the man. [...]

[...] 6/27, 2:30 AM: Due to a very busy day I missed the regular experiment, but as I was falling asleep for the night I saw quite clearly the white-haired, shaggy head of an old woman. [...]

(Also, I saw a big black spider on woman’s dress, over one breast. [...]

Part of this does have to do with beliefs concerning sex (as Jane wrote recently), in that he feels a woman’s position is basically less solid than the male’s to begin with. He was afraid that his ideas would be ridiculed because he was a woman, not having the credentials of the accepted academy or sex.

[...] He is afraid that dependence as a woman threatens you because of his own beliefs. [...]

[...] And I even wonder about the woman [Mrs. Anderson] who lived in this house, and committed suicide later—though it’s no big deal. [...]

[...] And where people believe in things like ghosts and demons all on the same line, seeing little difference between them and I imagine in my most schizoid (Doug—“that’s what I said”) moments that there is a woman called Jane Butts in a strange, funny little town in a completely fantastic place called Elmira, New York. And I have the delusion that I speak through this woman and look out through her eyes at the most fantastic creatures imaginable. [...]

[...] For if I am speaking through the body of a woman, so have the three men here present spoken through the bodies of women when those bodies were their own, and the women spoke as men. [...]

There is a woman close to him with whom he has a brotherly relationship, and who helps tend to his wants. [...]

[...] She found a woman talking to her and giving her information and knew that she could get this at just about anytime. [...]

(9:48.) In those previous “decadent” European centuries, a man’s or a woman’s worth was indisputably settled by the circumstances of birth. [...]

(Pause.) Ruburt tried to prove his worth while being possessed of a fine intellect not considered womanly. [...]

A few day’s later, I received a long distance call at home from a woman who told me that Seth’s appearance on the “Today’s Woman Show” convinced her of life after death, though she had never believed in it before. [...]

[...] My husband, Rob, and I sat with Sonja Carlson and Jack Cole, who were interviewing us on the Boston “Today’s Woman Show” on television station WBZ. [...]

(In the unscheduled session for December 3 Seth said Peggy would meet a woman dressed in green. Peggy met no such woman. [...]

They saw a motion picture about a woman with lovers, and a cripple, or perhaps a dwarf. [...]

[...] There was a woman dressed in blue on the plane. [...]

The woman directly behind our friends’ seat may have a child with her. [...]

[...] She thought the church meant that a woman should be either a nun or a mother.

[...] In a smaller, individual framework, each man and woman, then, is motivated by this same value fulfillment. [...]

So much of a man or a woman shows to others. [...]

[...] The ill woman’s reality does not threaten his own in any way. [...]

As a matter of fact, the kind of literal answers that you may think you want can indeed lead you somewhat astray in terms of the larger picture, so Ruburt must say: “That is not my province,” send energy, a note now and then; but the particular problem, the specific problem is the woman’s, not Ruburt’s.

[...] Bow down before no man, no woman, and no belief — but know you are indeed the creators.

[...] Suppose the worst, that in this life you have the following background—you are poor, you are of a minority race, you are not intellectual, you are a woman, you have a severe physical defect and you are no beauty. [...]

([Joel:] “Didn’t you say earlier, referring to the woman who was born in a minority race, that her challenges had been set up by a previous personality in our terms?”)

[...] Yet in the physical framework there is a constant intermixing, so that the cells of a man or a woman may become the cells of a plant or an animal,⁴ and of course vice versa. [...]

4. Jane and I understand Seth’s point when he tells us that “the cells of a man or woman may become the cells of a plant or an animal.” [...]

(To Sally.) What Ruburt was tuning into earlier was a 17th-century existence of yours in which you were also a woman. [...]

The same mechanism that causes a disturbed woman, say, to perform repetitive action such as a constant washing and rewashing of hands, also causes a particular kind of apparition to return time and time again to one place. [...]

[...] If a male writer or artist had to work to develop his abilities, then a woman had to work twice as hard. You also picked of course a woman you knew would not want children, but Ruburt felt a division between his biological nature and his art back then.