“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] He is verbal. [...]

[...] Very difficult to verbalize….” [...]

[...] Unfortunately, it is amazingly difficult to verbally describe the connections between the dream state, health, cultural stimuli, and the way all of these are put together in the interrelationship of body and mind —but Ruburt’s notes on his dreams and other experiences, being specific, can offer some excellent clues. [...]

[...] In these you will receive some information that cannot be given verbally. [...]

[...] For this reason there was an easy distinction between what was called inner sight and outer sight, and it was quite natural for them to close their eyes when seated in conversation in order to communicate more clearly, enjoying the ever-changing and immediate inner images that accompanied any verbal interchange.

[...] You may comprehend the meaning of a dream without understanding it at all in verbal terms. [...]

[...] You cannot teach a boy to be “the strong silent male type,” and then expect him to excel either verbally or in social relationships. [...]

[...] Bringing such issues into the open does help, for the more consciously you become aware of what you are saying through a physical condition, the more adequately you can state it verbally, or in other ways. [...]

[...] Right away I could see how they might be related at times, yet I wasn’t able to spontaneously verbalize the connections. [...]

You are so close, some of you, to understanding that cannot be verbalized, and yet I cannot give you a boost because they must come from you. [...]

Much of this is very difficult to verbalize. [...]

[...] “Boy,” she said, “I was getting stuff toward the end that neither of us — Seth or me — could verbalize. [...]

[...] I think that it operates as a psychological and psychic framework that frees me from normal verbal reference, letting me express and communicate inner feelings and data that lie just beneath formalized word patterns.

Some of this is difficult to verbalize. [...]

[...] She seemed to try to supplement her verbal descriptions by outlining objects with her hands, as though she was seeing things somewhat difficult to put into words specifically enough. [...]

[...] There may be errors having to do with verbal interpretation. [...]

[...] They were formed before you had any ability to reflect upon them, and now you have your relative dislike of reading, distrust of verbal expression, for example. [...]

[...] John Bradley said the material was much harder to follow, when given verbally, than it was the last time he witnessed a session. [...]

[...] It was hard for her to verbalize her feelings, to even tell me about them, but she felt waves of panic and fear sweep through her—not hidden or covered up now, but faced and admitted, although with much difficulty. [...]

[...] Seth hadn’t actually given us the material during Wednesday’s session, nor did he now — instead Jane verbalized it on her own to some extent. [...]

[...] Then at 11:15: “I’m just waiting …” Then: “Now I’m getting different things but they aren’t clear, so I’ll just wait …” Then at 11:20: “I’m getting one of those frustrating things that’s too big — too massive, really, — to be verbalized. [...]