“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(When I turned Jane on her back at 1:15 this afternoon, and removed the foam-rubber doughnut from between her knees, she didn’t want me to massage her left leg as I’ve been doing lately. [...]

These particular events began Friday though now Monday afternoon I’ve nearly forgotten what Friday was really like. [...]

[...] Dr. Guy left us a book written by a scientist about a famous medium, and I’ll be mailing it back to him as soon as we’ve read it.)

[...] This weekend—it’s Sunday afternoon as I type this—we’ve been literally so occupied that we didn’t take the time to go food shopping for the week’s supply. [...]

[...] This, all after we’ve found a suitable place and have sold our house in Elmira on 1730 Pinnacle Road. [...]

[...] In a strange way, I’ve even become inhibited about asking him the direct questions I think I so much want the answers to. [...]

[...] “It’s usually advanced stuff that we haven’t come to yet, and I’ll say, ‘Hey, what’s happening?’ Sometimes it’s just information for me — but anyhow, I know dictation’s been going on and that you’ve been taking notes. [...]

[...] “Boy, I’ve got the whole thing right there,” she said enthusiastically. [...]

“But I know, if I looked at each of you and the selves you think you are, with just the little experience I’ve got of the self I thought I was and find I’m not, that you have all kinds of potentialities right now, not that you necessarily have to wait for or work for or anything, but that you have now. [...]

[...] I’ve seen it as Buddy would come from here to the other guy. [...]

[...] But given that right kind of equanimity, time — our ordinary time — slides by; then, looking back periodically, we discover that we’ve accomplished at least something of what we wanted to do.

(One of the events we’ve been preparing for is the visit tomorrow of Tam Mossman, Jane’s editor at Prentice-Hall, Inc. [...]

[...] Only portions of the session are given here, and I’ve rearranged them — and Sue’s notes — a bit for convenience’s sake. [...]

2. I’ve given fictitious names to Jane’s students, “Alex” and “Warren.”

[...] “But the fact is, we’ve received plenty of letters that I could have used since then. [...] I could have used something older than you are—as I’ve done before. [...]

[...] I’ve never studied art, and my paintings are rather childish in execution, done with raw color. [...]

[...] The picture is one of our favorites, and belongs to Rob’s “people series”—portraits of people we’ve never met. [...]

[...] I’ve never heard or seen anything like this!”

[...] “I’ve put my finger on it. [...]

[...] We’ve changed its location several times but never removed it. [...]

[...] “I’ve always moved furniture, even as a kid,” I said. [...]

[...] “I’ve got that feeling again,” Jane said, after she’d come out of a deep trance. [...]

(From Seth’s delivery following last break, I’ve deleted less than two short sentences of very personal material. [...]

[...] From Seth and ourselves we’ve accumulated much unpublished material about Jane’s symptoms and attendant matters. [...]

[...] Six months before starting “Unknown” Reality, however, he made a few remarks that I’ve applied ever since to life in our physical reality: “Each person chooses his or her parents, accepting in terms of environment and heredity a bank of characteristics, attitudes, and abilities from which to draw in physical life. [...]

[...] I did read Jane the four sessions we’ve had so far, late this afternoon.)

[...] “They’ve got to start somewhere.”

[...] One of them was one of the last I’ve painted before Jane went into the hospital. [...]

[...] We’ve learned that Dr. K. is an extremely conscientious person, but our way of thinking is quite outside of hers. [...]

[...] As of today when I’m typing this, Sunday, we’ve heard no word at all about any results. [...]

([Mark:]“Yes, I’ve suddenly been feeling thoughts of love for this person in the hopes that this will help.”)

([Valerie:] “What am I going to do with all these charges that I’ve got built up?”)

[...] Mind-blowing … I don’t know whether they’ve been expressed just like that before, or not. [...]

[...] It didn’t take long: Out of those very interesting ideas he’d mentioned in class last night, Seth ended up discussing the one I’ve noted as point 5.

(As we lay in bed after last Monday’s session, Jane told me: “I’ve got it — from Seth, I think: A really complete astrological chart would have to include not only the time of your birth, but that of your death.” [...]

2. While Seth was giving his material on the fetus, I found myself recalling some ideas I’ve mentioned to Jane at various times during the last couple of years, and have written about briefly: