“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Now basically it is not true to say that an individual’s decisions must be based upon concrete events within his own past, nor that he is largely imprisoned by his past, nor that his future actions are predetermined by his past experience. [...]

[...] I don’t think her “sinful self” could have risen to such prominence without feeding upon those repressions, clamping down more and more within the psyche as the years passed, continuing its misguided but “well-meaning attempt to protect the creative self … to keep a hand of caution on its course lest the centuries of men’s belief in sin carried a true weight that I shared but could not comprehend.” [...]

[...] True space travel would of course be time-space travel,⁵ in which you learned how to use points in your own universe as “dimensional clues” that would serve as entry points into other worlds. [...]

(Long pause.) I am not denying the importance of true reason. [...]

[...] It interprets the inner knowledge gained in its own way, true, but it is immeasurably enriched by so doing. [...]

[...] The experience is so strange that for a moment I think I’m dead, though I know this isn’t true. [...]

[...] True, the data was not as specific as it has often been, but it did contain a number of valid points. [...]

[...] It is true also, as he knows, that the Florida incident frightened him enough so that he will not leave a job unless he is almost forced into it.

(9:44.) It is certainly too simple to say what I am going to say, yet it is almost as if you would be better off turning the entire rational approach upside down, taking it for granted that all of its assumptions were false, for they are indeed more false than true (intently). [...]

[...] Yet true infinity reaches far beyond past or future, and into all probabilities — not simply straightforward into time, or backward.

(True. [...]

(Nor is it true that we didn’t believe him; merely that along the way the slow daily passage of time, with its inevitable delays, etc. [...]

[...] It is true at this point, under ordinary circumstances—that is ordinary for you—you cannot “see”—in quotes—my structure. [...]

[...] You have your mathematics from us; a shadow of true mathematics, for here again you have insisted upon hemming-in realities. [...]

[...] It is true that five months earlier it would not have been possible to get this much valid information through during such a period.

[...] It is true my father lost his hay fever when I was very young.

In one sense meeting with you costs me little energy, it is true. [...]

It is true that Priestley speaks in terms of consciousness being retained at this stage, but a consciousness devoid of personality is an odd bird indeed. The personality structure changes, it is true, but consciousness of overall identities within any given unit of consciousness is always retained. [...]

[...] For if all of a person’s lifework isn’t known, how can its true worth in all of its human complexity ultimately be known? [...]

[...] That may be true, but I’m also sure that she would have expressed her innate creativity in other surely literary ways—and maybe in psychic ways, too! [...]

Of the two of us I was supposed to be the artist in the conventional sense, yet I’d always felt that I couldn’t rival Jane’s amazingly simple but brilliantly colored art that was so true to her innate psychic knowledge—while seemingly ignoring it! [...]

[...] Now it is true, generally speaking, that material of an emotional nature actually has a stronger vitality and is easier to perceive. [...]