“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(For the next four paragraphs, I experienced many instances of what I thought might be telepathy between Jane and me. [...]

First however I would like to speak briefly about Ruburt’s attempts at telepathy with Philip last evening. [...]

[...] However, telepathy does exist. [...]

[...] Jim also wanted to tell us about two of his friends who had been running some telepathy tests with personnel at the parapsychology lab at Duke University. [...]

[...] Telepathy is one of the main binders in the world of constructions. [...]

3. Seth could be referring to his remark in the 34th session for March 11, 1964: “Telepathic communications go on continually beneath consciousness, and without the aid of telepathy and of the inner senses, language itself would be meaningless. [...]

[...] What about telepathy between the hemispheres? [...]

[...] I should tell you that while I use the word telepathy we do not communicate in mental words. [...]

[...] The telepathy occurrence with your witness is an example. [...]

[...] Telepathy, which belongs to the inner senses, is used constantly. [...]

[...] Your own dreams greatly affect the actions that you take within the physical situation, and as you know telepathy operates within dreams.

Secondary physical constructions are those created by a consciousness of its conception of other consciousnesses, from data received through telepathy and other means.

[...] One of my favorite sessions, however, is the 566th in Chapter 16, where Seth discusses the “profound psychological interconnections” involving probable pasts and futures, dreams, telepathy, present abilities, suggestion, and related subjects. [...]

[...] The scientific communities are even now being forced to consider the possibilities of telepathy as a means of communication, and they will be forced further and further along these lines.

[...] 2. Telepathy is the communication of thoughts or emotions between minds, regardless of distance. In actuality, it’s often difficult to tell whether clairvoyance, telepathy, or both operated in a given instance. [...]

“When such abilities as telepathy occur, this telepathic function is carried on continually by this other self-conscious part of you; but as a rule you act upon those data without the knowledge of the conscious self with which you are familiar.

[...] I’d better mention at this point that Seth says that telepathy operates constantly, providing inner communications to back up all sense data.

[...] It may also involve direct telepathy, Jane reading my thoughts here.

[...] The 26th session with John Bradley as a witness had done her much good; especially had the telepathy effect increased her confidence. [...]

(In the 180th session, after the second envelope experiment, Seth told us he worked well clairvoyantly with objects, although at times telepathy could enter into such experiments.)

Basically there is no difference between precognition and telepathy. [...]