“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Since we are on the subject I suggest that Ruburt wash his mouth four times a day, for at least a week, with salt water. [...]

As best I can interpret the objective information at hand, the physical locale of my subjective experience is a precarious one, since outside the eastern and southern boundaries of Jerusalem the terrain quickly drops away into valleys close and steep enough to protect the city from large-scale attack — with hardly enough room there for the “hordes” of Roman soldiers I saw on the “flat ground.” [...]

(I was not at all sure the data on the family group applied to the envelope object, so I picked this subject.

[...] By now of course I was quite sure that this was deliberate upon Seth’s part, considering the subject matter of the material. [...]

[...] She described it to me — and tonight Seth followed that subject matter very closely in the first part of the session. [...]

[...] Then see Note 2 for Appendix 22, which contains some of the reasons why we often find it difficult to return to a certain session to flesh out a certain subject.

[...] I’ve chosen excerpts dealing with the subjects at hand. [...]

[...] I had mentioned the subject during last break, saying that perhaps Seth would discuss it.

[...] After this experience he told me that the subjective feeling is its own proof — and of course, it is.

[...] It is good for you both, not only because of the particular group here, and the subject matter, but also because it gives you contact with other people under a different context. [...]

[...] so she has a subjective feeling that her voice is different, and that sometimes it is a strain to pause in the middle of a monologue to speak to me as herself and not Seth. [...]

[...] I had the odd feeling that the sensation was related both to the subject of conversation, and to some kind of message or communication I sensed or felt within; I believe that each time I experienced it, I was involved in talk about other people; relatives, children or perhaps parents.

[...] The Lindens had not discussed these with us—perhaps they found the subject too painful. [...]

[...] Perhaps the meaning is subjective, as well as the size of the handstamp in relation to the size of the whole object.

I can’t note the same for The Magical Approach to Reality: A Seth Book—the very promising work that Jane and I first discussed a year and a half ago [in August 1980], after Seth had started his group of excellent private sessions on that subject.⁸ I watched Jane try to write the book a number of times; last month, in Note 6 for Session 939 [in this chapter], I finally expressed the opinion that she wouldn’t finish the job. [...] I think Magical Approach would have been a fine book as she planned it—but that it ended up squelched by at least two major factors: She was too inhibited by the subject matter [her physical symptoms] out of which the magical approach material had grown, and she was bothered because she had chosen to emulate the plodding way in which I put together the Seth books. [...]

[...] Others were valid subjective events of a different kind, and the entire production was in response to my suggestions for a mood-changing dream.

([Pat:] “I think Dick is interested in the subject. [...]

[...] As Jane continued her delivery I noticed that Bill was staring quite consistently into the open bath doorway; yet I did not pay great attention to this, taking it somewhat for granted that Seth would use Bill/Mark only as a talking point relating to whatever subject he discussed.)