“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The letting-go of effort should be also a mental and psychological stance applied not only to Ruburt’s physical dilemma, but to his—and your—relationships with the subjective and objective worlds. [...]

[...] We have wondered before about Seth making statements concerning something that might be in the presence of the subject for the test, only to have the subject fail to notice it. [...]

[...] You may need to make certain deletions, but upon any given subject I prefer not to be paraphrased.

The book is not something that can be done in between times, as there should be a grouping of subject matter, rather than a strict page by page rendition. [...]

[...] We resolved to ask him to explain — but strangely enough, I note later, a month passed before we got around to a session on the subject. [...]

[...] In your terms, you cannot be allowed to go into other dimensions until you have learned the great power of your thoughts and subjective feelings. [...]

[...] I thought it might be interesting to ask Seth to comment on Ella, so I also mentioned this subject just before the session.

[...] While I am engrossed in this particular subject I will therefore continue with it. [...]

Any real psychology must take all these levels of the self into consideration, for the physically-oriented self that you know is largely formed by the subjective self of which you know so little.

(Since session time was near, Jane asked aloud that Seth interpret the subjective data she had been receiving. [...]

(“Can I ask a question off the subject?”)

[...] This direct kind of knowledge is available, again, on any subject, to anyone who provides a suitable pattern through desire, love, intent or belief.

[...] It’s practically impossible, for example, to get free of the connotations of the worst elements of the whole field: the moment the subject comes up, we’re associated with all the history of mediumship in the most banal of terms. [...]

[...] It [the conscious mind] cannot reflect upon phenomena subjectively. [...]

[...] Seth had referred to probabilities and hinted at reincarnation in connection with Rooney, I realized as I scanned the notes, but before I could ask about such relationships he returned with a page of information for Jane on a different subject. [...]

[...] Jane was fairly dissociated yet she was still aware of the subject matter above. [...]

(Jane also sent two more poems on the subject to the newspaper. [...]

[...] And your camouflage patterns can most aptly be compared to the hallucinary effects created by the hypnotist upon his subject.

When this focus is finished, when the subject tells himself “Now I will come to, now I have solved the problems that I set out to solve,” then what happens is the withdrawal of the self from the plane. [...]

And Jane herself has been thinking about the whole subject of psychic interrelationships since holding the 732nd session almost a month ago. [...]

[...] Politics, of course, contains extensive material on the same subject (as well as on our house-hunting adventures).

[...] I couldn’t help here; as a boy of less than 12, I hadn’t been that consciously aware of subjective states other than my own. [...]

The thought, as an electrical reality, is not subject to the physical laws that bind the physical body. [...]

[...] This climate is more than the result of the materials or subject matter or nature of which the work is composed. [...]

Many difficulties arise when you compare yourselves to stylized or idealized versions of yourselves—to composite images of yourselves that you may have picked up along the way—a subject that we have mentioned earlier. [...]

[...] The qualities of the equation have highly subjective meanings, and they need not be the same meanings to each of you who are involved with them. [...]

[...] Then, the answer will come in terms of subjective experience. [...]

Though you may not realize it, you really manage your subjective lives in a rather circular fashion. [...]