“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The subconscious mechanism had to do with the entire affair and I wanted you to realize it. [...]

[...] You did not accept gracefully or openly that which was given, which was all these individuals had to give at that time, but subconsciously demanded that they give to the same scale that you gave and repaid love to the same scale as if there were, indeed, a point system and they fell short. [...]

The ordinary experiences that come to you as you go about your day come to you from beyond both the conscious and subconscious self, and they have come so naturally, as they should, that you did not realize their intrusive nature. [...]

[...] Only after such a basis will the idea of reincarnation achieve its natural validity, and only when it is understood that the subconscious, certain layers of it, is a link between the present personality and past ones, will the theory of reincarnation be accepted as fact. [...]

[...] What you call negative suggestions are often judgments of the ego, for suggestion works from the ego to the subconscious, as well as it works the other way around. [...]

In most cases the stimuli [toward healing] come from deeper levels of the self, where they may be translated into terms that the personal subconscious can use. [...]

[...] The subconscious is quite capable of handling the situation in this manner. [...]

[...] Besides, there was that pressing question: Was Seth part of my subconscious? [...]

[...] On the other hand, while he did critically examine our material, he insisted in those terms “that he must be responsible for it,” in that he and everyone else must take normal responsibility in a fashion for “subconscious” actions or revelatory information. [...]

(Needless to say, when Carl or whoever was measuring pressure on the scale, the other three took pains to see that they were not subconsciously exerting a heavy pressure on the other side of the table,thus forcing a stronger response across the tabletop to get the legs back on the floor. [...]

[...] The interpretation is his own, colored by subconscious prejudice, and largely a matter of vocabulary. [...]

[...] I wasn’t conscious of breathing any differently than usual, but if this was a subconscious production that wouldn’t make any difference. [...]

[...] The “new” Freudian ideas of the unsavory unconscious led further to a new dilemma, for it was then—as it is now—widely believed that as the result of experiences in infancy the subconscious, or unconscious, might very well sabotage the best interests of the conscious personality, and trick it into illness and disaster.

[...] The entity operates its fragments in what you would call a subconscious manner, that is, without conscious direction. [...]

[...] In many cases however the stimulus comes from the deeper levels of the self, where however it may be translated into terms that the personal subconscious can use.

[...] I use it, with excellent results, to obtain ideomotor — “subconscious” — responses about knowledge that lies just outside my usual consciousness. [...]

[...] There is Ruburt’s ego, and his subconscious, as you know. [...]

[...] Joseph chose subconsciously to interrupt those methods of expression he was using at the time simply so that their interference would claim due notice.

Families have subconscious purposes, though the individual members of the family may pursue these goals without conscious awareness. [...]

[...] However, suggestions should always be given before sleep, that the subconscious will maintain the organic integrity of the physical organism. [...]

Ruburt explained, after hearing about the automatic communications, that these were simply repressed elements of the subconscious finding needed outlet. [...]