“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Science’s flawed self still carries the same import, however, the idea being that while science does not deal with values, so its says, it misleads itself considerably in making such statements, for it projects the worst kind of values both upon mankind and the rest of nature—so even if you are not tainted from religion’s old beliefs, it is difficult to escape such ideas. [...]

The natural person can be evoked, and its responses elicited, particularly through touching and through statements of love and affection. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s forgotten dream was a clear psychological statement in which all of the elements in his personality momentarily joined not only for a discussion, so to speak, but blended their forces, exerted their energies, and set up a firm intent to clarify the entire situation, and to exert all of their energies in a successful healing venture. [...]

[...] The statement that I suggested should also be written, along with those procedures; the plans for the front porch (via Frank Longwell) and for the small (class) group should be further considered, for they also represent motion on other levels. [...]

Concerning Jane’s understandable desire to protect her work, long ago she published some very clear statements about that. [...]

[...] We’d have respected his statements on that aspect of his abilities and intents as much as we did—and do—on any other. [...]

Involved with this simple statement, however, as background, all of the material I have given you should be at least somewhat understood, particularly the sessions Ruburt is working with in the late summer of 1980 onward. [...]

(This statement, Jane told me, made Seth angry. [...] At its end will be found a copy of Mark’s statement.)

[...] I’ll tell you, I’ll make out a statement to that effect.”

“What will I call, uh, Seth, in my statement?” Mark asked and Seth interrupted,

[...] I do not want to hurt Ruburt’s feelings, and I have avoided making this statement thus far, but I have been emotionally more involved with you in past existences [than with Ruburt]. [...]

[...] Those statements are self-evident to me, while you of course are still in the process of thinking them over, and trying to fit them into the context of life as you know it. [...]

[...] If you accept those statements as true, then you will begin to feel an emotional sense of rightness with yourselves. [...]

[...] You might be spiritually refreshed, yet as a rule you would not consider the feeling to be a statement of any legitimate reality, or a representation of your psyche’s existence.

[...] Despite distorted versions of that last statement, however, there is still obviously a distinct difference, say, between the thought of adultery and its physical expression.

I do admit that from your standpoint—or viewpoint—that it may be very difficult to accept some of the statements that I make—that appear perhaps even to be directly contradictory to your observation of Ruburt on a daily basis, and to his own experience of himself. [...]

I know that they are indicators of the body’s healing energies, and I also quite understand that in the overall you find such a statement unacceptable. [...]

(Very long pause at 10:21.) The statements I have made regarding the innate nature of the spontaneous self can be of the greatest service if they are accepted. [...]

[...] Recalling this statement as I had first recorded it, I had wondered about its accuracy more and more as Seth gave us additional information on the much wider abilities of the inner senses. Later, checking my original handwritten notes, I found that I had indeed taken the statement down that way, then typed it up that way. [...]

[...] I can exist electronically or I can exist chemically, and there is no contradiction or distortion in this statement. [...]

[...] Ruburt in particular, but this also applies to you, Joseph, and there is absolutely no distortion in this statement.

[...] Actually, I agree with that statement, while also being quite aware of my own humanness and the numerous pitfalls, real and imagined, that could stand between my performance and feeling as an individual and that greater state where there isn’t anything to fear. [...]

(Today marks a week since Seth’s statements concerning a writing sale on Jane’s part. [...]

[...] Doctor Kiley is also dead, has been for some years, at least seven, and was a brother of Helen McIlwain; she was in my dream of November 8, relating to my mother and Seth’s subsequent statements concerning her death. [...]

(That statement, in fact, plus her desire for material from Seth on a question of her own, made her wonder whether we’d even receive any book dictation tonight. [...]

[...] The two statements can appear to be contradictory. [...]

I made the statement that action in the present could alter the past, and now we shall set about explaining the statement.

[...] However I should explain the last statement to some degree. [...]

Now: the small morning statement I gave you each to read (in the deleted session for August 17, 1977) has worked. [...]

[...] Because that statement was couched as it was, it did not bring any arguments to your minds. [...]

[...] In a way each statement is true. [...]

That statement is a statement of fact. [...]

[...] They appear in your mind as statements of fact, far too obvious for examination.

[...] I tried to cling to the recent hopeful statements Seth has been making recently. [...]

[...] I repeat that statement here, again. [...]

[...] There were misses of course, and statements that hinted at, or came close to, events and thoughts involving our friends. [...]

[...] Jane has made copies of the clairvoyant material from the three sessions involving the Gallaghers; they are to write in their account of what actually transpired after each of Seth’s predictions or statements. [...]

(I asked Bill to elaborate on his previous statement. [...]

The last statement should not surprise you.

All systems, and this is a general statement, all systems are to some extent interinvolved. [...]

[...] It was not just that they believed suffering was good for the soul—a statement which can or cannot be true, incidentally, and I will go into that later—but they understood something else: The body will only take so much suffering when it releases consciousness. [...]

I’ll also endorse Seth’s statement that children “are often quite aware of willing themselves sick to get out of difficult situations.” [...]

[...] Nevertheless these statements concerning energy should be taken most seriously, for you both can benefit from them. [...] Ruburt’s performance during our sessions should certainly be adequate proof for my statements concerning additional energy automatically taken and used.

Incidentally my dear Joseph, I overheard you as you made a rather sardonic remark concerning my statement that you would have more energy as you needed it. [...]

[...] The correct statement is that you have truly and practically inexhaustible stores of energy to draw upon. [...]