“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (Long pause, eyes closed.) These are not just esoteric statements, but valid clues about the nature of your own behavior, meant to give you a sense of your own freedom, and to emphasize the importance of your choice.

[...] You simply have form without mass, to all practical purposes, and there is no contradiction in that statement.

“I do admit that from your standpoint—or viewpoint—that it may be very difficult to accept some of the statements that I make [which] appear perhaps even to be directly contradictory to your observation of Ruburt on a daily basis, and to his own experience of himself.

“I know that they are indicators of the body’s healing energies, and I also quite understand that in the overall you find such a statement unacceptable.

(Very long pause beginning at 10:21.) “The statements I have made regarding the innate nature of the spontaneous self can be of the greatest service if they are accepted. [...]

[...] Seth, making the above statement, gave no suggestions as to what might transpire. [...]

[...] I will however make this statement: The picture—

[...] The conscious idea itself represents a statement of intent. [...]

(I assume this statement refers to my getting upset this evening by the actions of our neighbors. [...]

[...] It appears that his statements are developing as he said they would.

[...] And this statement is an extremely simplified version of actuality.

[...] In the convent home, as you know, letters were censored, and only positive statements got through the censor. [...]

Poor health is indeed caused mainly by habitual destructive thought patterns which directly affect the physical system, because of the particular range within the electromagnetic system in which they fall; and despite any objections I will stick by this statement. [...]

[...] … When aggressiveness is the problem, for example, the preliminary dream suggestion should include a statement that the aggression will not be directed against a particular person. [...]

[...] Until I learned from Seth to “monitor” my own dreams, and awaken my critical faculties, I was simply astounded by some of his statements.

(This statement took me by surprise, until I remembered that in the 63rd session, June 17, 1964, page 159, Seth had given a date of Sept. [...]

[...] Before I continue into a discussion of other layers, and hence into a following dissertation connecting various types of dreams according to their origin in these layers, I will make a present, pertinent statement.

Yet a psychologist would come to this conclusion if the same statement were made about myself and Jane. [...]

[...] If you are tired of having me stress that point, I can only say that I hope the repetition will serve to make you understand that the statement applies to the most minute and the most important of the events that you experience.

The intellect therefore dealt with ideas it did not accept, and you can find this in those statements that he has made. [...]

We will begin with some rather general statements.

Your own discussions, and the improvement in your relationship as I told you, in one way is responsible for your latest developments in our sessions, and I include the Sumari—the songs, and the statement. [...]

[...] Then perhaps the statement will have more meaning for you.

[...] This would have to follow if my statement that the self is truly limitless is true.