“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] When or if, for example, aggressiveness is the problem, then the preliminary suggestion should include a statement that in the dream the aggression will be harmlessly acted out (underline harmlessly), and not directed against a particular individual.

[...] In a way the symptoms are a statement of the distance Ruburt wanted to maintain from public life, because he felt equally that he should go out into the world in a public manner, and “tackle it.”

[...] This is considered the most intellectually asinine (amused), Pollyanna-like statement. [...]

[...] During break we discussed John’s company, Searle Drug, which is in the throes of financial difficulties compounded by management problems; Seth has discussed this often when John has been present, and to date his statements have been accurate.

[...] Jane now asked John about it, but John said he wouldn’t tell her anything about such a statement yet. [...]

[...] After I made my statement about Ruburt and Joseph, Seth spelled out his reply through the board’s pointer as it moved quickly beneath our fingertips:)

That same 657th session contains Seth’s extremely useful statement: “The Present Is the Point of Power.” [...]

[...] Yet I still felt questions and statements going around in my head as we retired—and as is often the case in such situations I wondered if I’d gone too far in my reactions, and needlessly interfered with Jane’s attempts to probe into and understand a most difficult challenge. [...]

(“I can think of a lot of questions about that statement.”)

[...] Once the pendulum shows you that the subconscious does understand, however, it is all right to check now and then,but those statements can act as negative suggestions otherwise. [...]

I am sorry, I do not have it here, and I will not make any suitable comments that Ruburt might make, following your statement. [...]

[...] He tried, however, to explain what had happened, and his position, but those who were not in on the conspiracy would not understand, and misread his statements.

If I were to make the same statement for example to any of my readers, I would be accused of saying that physical reality was composed of the discards of the universe.

[...] In death they fulfilled their purposes, making a mass statement. [...]

[...] Then, Note 3 for the 688th session contains my statement that in an appendix for Session 711, “I assemble from various sessions information on the complex relationships involving Jane-Ruburt-Seth [and also Rob-Joseph].”

[...] Since the excerpts are still more representative than complete, however, due to the accumulated mass of information available, my own choices enter in: ESP class data are quoted a number of times; included is material summarizing Jane’s own theories about the Seth phenomena, as she worked them out in her recently completed Adventures in Consciousness; but reincarnation, while mentioned often, isn’t stressed in terms of particulars — that is, I refer to Seth’s statements that he, Jane and I led closely involved lives in Denmark in the 1600’s, but those lives aren’t studied per se. [...]

[...] Jane believed Seth when he told us he was an “energy personality essence, no longer focused in physical reality” — she just wanted to know more about what he meant by that statement. [...]

[...] Now that is a “mind-blowing” statement, and it applies to each of you. [...]

[...] You do not need your body then to make such a statement for you. [...]

In them of course one object may be a symbol, but there is no such thing as an overall statement of dream symbolism, in which a given symbol will have a general meaning. [...]

[...] As far back as the 613th session in Chapter One, Seth was making statements like this: “Your feelings have electromagnetic realities that rise outward, affecting the atmosphere itself,” but at the time we paid little attention to the implications behind such ideas. [...]

[...] John Bradley said he had no Wednesday appointments scheduled for the coming week, but would keep Seth’s statement in mind.

[...] As you know, spontaneously Ruburt would state your position to your family as a symbolic statement to the world at large for those reasons.

[...] When I say this, you are bound to interpret my statement to mean that daily waking reality may become dreamy, or blurred or indistinct. [...]

[...] This sort of news always surprises us, I guess, because we must be more isolated than we know; also, the sales aren’t all that great, so I always wonder just what the person bases such statements on when making them. [...]