“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] For example, it is a statement of fact, my dear Joseph, that when you leave your work on “Unknown” you must then spend much time reacquainting yourself with the material, struggling to assimilate material, regaining continuity, and so forth. [...]

These statements may seem highly dubious to you now, but when we are finished I hope that you will see that they are plain statements of fact.

It is difficult here to do more than simply give you the statement. [...]

[...] This statement will later lead us into further realms. [...]

I referred to that, I thought, in my preliminary statement about time references—that you recognize yourself in a dream even if the other references do not agree with known reality. [...]

(This statement of Seth’s has been more than vindicated. [...]

[...] (Pause.) Do not say “so-and-so will buy such-and-such a painting, he has the money,” if there is any touch of accusation in the statement “He has money.” [...]

[...] The impact of many of my statements of the past goes unrecognized, or perhaps the words sound pat, but there are other conditions of life that you do not perceive, sometimes because your time sequences are too different. [...]

[...] If I say to you: “Life came from a dream,” such a statement sounds meaningless. [...]

[...] Jane and I have now received from them their checklist, made against Seth’s predictions and statements, and as soon as it is typed up the material will be inserted into a session.

(Seth made this statement well over a year ago, saying I believe that the reasons had to do with earthly magnetic fields.)

[...] Often a question or statement of mine, for instance, will remind her to tell me something. [...]

I … This is through your friend—a message… He says that I cannot tell time, and that you will consider this a flighty statement.

[...] I am not saying that I do not use analogies often, or that I am not forced at times into symbolic statements, but when I am I always say so, and even those statements are my best representations of facts too large for your definitions. [...]

[...] In the past you have both felt at some disadvantage yourselves, feeling our work to be theoretically fascinating, creatively valid, but not necessarily containing any statement about any kind of “scientifically valid” hardbed reality. [...]

[...] Ruburt has the quote, and the statement is true. [...]

[...] Unthinking statement, for many people—in fact, most—have in their own ways far more difficult problems, and far less achievement, joy or understanding. [...]

(Earlier this evening I’d mentioned to Jane my long-standing interest in Seth’s statement, years ago, that all ESP perceptions have an electromagnetic basis. [...]

[...] He was quite correct in his written statement concerning the development of consciousness.

[...] This is not an original statement, but the past only has the power that you give it.

[...] If there is any doubt in the future, for one thing check the portion of the material in which the doubtful statement is made. [...]

[...] Also on checking wait for a few minutes, Joseph, and then ask the doubtful question again, or rephrase the statement into a question. [...]

The validity of this whole material will show clearly through whatever distortions ever arise, and the material itself will provide more and more proof for its statements as we continue. [...]

[...] I was in no condition to offer or indeed to make any critical judgement at the time, and Seth was fully focused in delivering the statement to the students, however. [...]

(9:10 P.M. Jane began her own dictation before tonight’s session by saying that as she’d typed her statements yesterday [for Appendix 4] she would “get glimpses” of some of the concepts Seth was going to talk about in “Unknown” Reality — yet they would immediately vanish from her consciousness, so that all she had left was the knowledge that she’d experienced the insight.

This statement implies the unstated, and the reverse also applies.

[...] Page 102 is a psy-time experiment of Jane’s; the rest are statements made during sessions. [...]

In line with the statement that action necessarily changes that which it acts upon (in parentheses: which is basically itself), then it follows that the action involved in these sessions changes the nature of the sessions.

After this there was an inhibiting factor involved, and only a portion of my statement actually came through, you see. The distortion resulted from the cautionary statement that was not allowed to come through.