“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In your terms other universes, with all of their own space and time structures, were created simultaneously, and exist simultaneously. [...]

(Pause at 9:31.) I said that in your terms (underlined) all universes were created (underlined) simultaneously—at the same time. [...]

(“Now, if you had all been really paying attention to what I have been saying for some time about the simultaneous nature of time and existence, then you would have known that the theory of evolution is as beautiful a tale as the theory of biblical creation. [...]

(9:30.) At the risk of really repeating myself, let me state that time as you know it does not exist basically and that all creations are simultaneous. [...]

[...] As I told Jane at our first break, the knowledge that time is actually simultaneous is sometimes confounding when one asks certain types of questions; this knowledge half answers the question, yet we want the rest of the question considered.)

You can within them often perceive both your past and present simultaneously, but this has always been a characteristic of the whole self in any case. [...]

All portions of course exist simultaneously. [...]

In other terms, you could say that an entity visits all planes simultaneously, as it is possible for you to visit a certain state, county, and city at one time. You might also visit the states of sorrow and joy almost simultaneously, and experience both emotions in heightened form because of the almost immediate contrast between them.

You live many lives simultaneously. [...]

(9:54.) Since all existences are simultaneous, this simply means his stressing certain aspects in this life — at the expense of others, you would say — and setting up a frame of reference that may seem to be limiting. [...]

Since all is simultaneous, your present beliefs can alter your past ones, whether from this life or a “previous” one. [...]

While the two dimensions seem entirely separate, and while it is most difficult, nearly impossible, to dwell within both simultaneously, there are effects which occur in both. The two perspectives or dimensions do exist simultaneously, even though you cannot inhabit them simultaneously.

[...] His simultaneous time, or spacious present, is certainly such a concept. Yet in the next paragraph I added that in my opinion, “Seth’s concept of simultaneous time will always elude us to some extent as long as we’re physical creatures….” [...]

[...] Somehow Jane and I always understood, to make an analogy, that Seth’s kind of “simultaneous” reincarnation [or anyone else’s kind, for that matter] wasn’t acceptable in our Western societies at this time in history; we could trace out many reasons why this is so. [...]

[...] For that matter, all of the material in this appendix shows the interrelationship between our ideas of serial time and Seth’s simultaneous time. [...]

[...] The spacious present, while existing spontaneously, while happening simultaneously, still contains within it qualities of duration.

So do portions of each entity find simultaneous expression within various systems or units of action, and they must then progress within these systems according to the specific properties of the systems. Units or systems then are open, interdependent and simultaneous in actuality.

[...] The systems or units are basically simultaneous actions. [...]

[...] This enables you to unite and combine harmoniously the elements on the various channels simultaneously. [...]

None of these portions of the self are the whole self, obviously, and until the whole self is able to perceive its own parts simultaneously, then these seemingly separate portions of the self appear to themselves isolated to a large degree, and alone.

[...] The inner ego is the director as you know, but the whole self must know itself simultaneously. [...]

[...] Identity or continuity of the self is retained and strengthened in a series of simultaneous events, with value fulfillment foremost insofar as purposeful action is concerned.

Behind this you see is the fear that simultaneous release of feelings can be disruptive. [...]

[...] For both of us exist simultaneously, and other portions of your own identities exist simultaneously with those that you know. [...]

[...] Could you have simultaneous evolution? [Here we go again, I speculated, back to struggling with that contradictory notion of “simultaneous time.”] How does Seth’s instantaneous “beginning processes that formed the universe”—with no time involved—square with fossils in the earth? [...]

[...] There was no time, so all of this “was happening” simultaneously. [...]

So beside this spontaneous creation, this simultaneous “stream” of divine rousing, All That Is began to watch the interactions that occurred among his own subjective progeny. [...]

([Gene]: “But I can’t leave the system because I am in all systems simultaneously.”)

[...] This does not mean you are not dwelling in other systems simultaneously. [...]

[...] You will discover your whole selves, peeping inward and outward simultaneously, and know that all divisions are illusion.”

Many people are aware of double or triple dreams, when they seem to have two or three simultaneous dreams. [...]

In double dreams and triple dreams consciousness shows its transparent, simultaneous nature. [...]

[...] Next, pretend that you are waking from the dream to realize that another dream was simultaneously occurring, and ask yourself quickly what that dream was. [...]

I wanted to make this point, since matter is created by the subconscious, and since it exists simultaneously and instantaneously, and since its creation or arrival, and its departure or replacement, are instantaneous. [...]

[...] Antimatter, using your terms, exists simultaneously with your universe, having what I will call antigravity, and in what I will call anti-space.

[...] In the waking state he is able, now, to alter the direction of his focus precisely enough to bring about a condition in which he perceives both realities simultaneously. [...]

[...] He was simultaneously himself here in this living room, watching the image of himself in a library room, and he was the self in the library. [...]

[...] Given Seth’s concept of simultaneous time, I thought I might have glimpsed another existence — whether a reincarnational one or a probable one — that I was living now.

For myself, I think of reincarnational selves as having their roots in the physical reality we know (whether in simultaneous or linear terms of time), but of probable selves as having much wider and more complicated ranges of existence: I believe that even though we create them on an individual basis, our probable selves can reach into a multitude of other realities, both physical and nonphysical. [...]

[...] They exist simultaneously. [...]

[...] But I found it at least roughly reminiscent of Seth’s idea of simultaneous time to watch the color broadcasts from different areas of the world each day, and then to mentally hold all of those actions, especially the backgrounds, in mind at once, visualizing them as simultaneous happenings at different places on the planet.

[...] Without giving away any “secrets,” I can write that on both occasions Seth discussed the subject in conjunction with his postulates about ideals, myths, religion, probabilities, and the simultaneous nature of time.)