“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] As you live in an obvious physical universe, sharing in its reality, so each of you exists in a far vaster psychological or psychic universe — surrounded by, supported by, and part of psychic or psychological entities (long pause) infinite in their variety. [...]

We will be quite aware that we are ourselves, however — the multidimensional personalities who shared a more or less common environment at one level of our existence. [...]

[...] That firewalker shares his reality with nonfirewalkers, in general terms, but in this one instance the firewalker superimposes a strong counterbelief, and it works

[...] I am not saying that his reality is not his own, that he does not have the joy and responsibility for it, but that you also share a joint reality.

[...] Yet each location is as unique as the habitat of any animal — as private, as shared, as significant in terms of the individual and the species of which that individual is a part. [...]

According to Seth, we do have shared dreams or mass dreams. [...] In the 254th session Seth had this to say: “In certain areas of mass, shared dreams, collective mankind deals with problems of his political and social structure. [...]

[...] Shared dreams, then, are also usually well beneath awareness. [...]

[...] Floyd is an extremely generous and caring individual who has helped us many times over the years; he’s the contractor who converted half of our double garage for the hill house into Jane’s writing room.² Jane and I have each shared a number of psychic experiences with him.

[...] He has tried expressing those abilities while feeling he needed all kinds of safeguards, both because he partially shared the belief that energy was dangerous, and because he also feared that other people would react to him in that fashion.

[...] Early artists drew pictures to share the images they saw in their dreams. [...]

[...] You draw upon the people you share your new environment with. [...]

[...] In a fashion this involved old Christian principles, of course, as pure socialism does—so that a man shared his goods with his fellows, and all land belonged to the people, so that private property—in those terms—would not exist.

[...] She asked me if she could share my studio with me and of course I agreed, having offered this arrangement some time ago. [...]

Incidentally, I share Ruburt’s annoyance with your fat neighbor across the way, and I will tell you some tales about him before I am finished.

In the time those fears originated, he shared the belief framework of Christianity, so that he believed that outside of that framework there could indeed be nothing but chaos, or the conventional atheism of science, in which the universe was at the mercy of meaningless mechanistic laws—laws, however, that operated without logic, but more importantly laws that operated without feeling. [...]

[...] Man, as you think of him, shared the earth with the other creatures just mentioned. [...]

[...] The word tempt is important, for it implies on you part a willingness to have him taste and share with you both through food and sexual enjoyment. [...]

[...] Many who shared those conditions with me learned little. [...]

[...] What difference does it make if I have a few mundane achievements that are shared by many others, that are in no way unique? [...]

[...] The old world view, the official one, may still be comforting you, for it is shared by millions. [...]

[...] I don’t think her “sinful self” could have risen to such prominence without feeding upon those repressions, clamping down more and more within the psyche as the years passed, continuing its misguided but “well-meaning attempt to protect the creative self … to keep a hand of caution on its course lest the centuries of men’s belief in sin carried a true weight that I shared but could not comprehend.” [...]

[...] I had to learn that if I shared a marriage in which my wife had developed a chronic illness, then certain portions of me had also participated in that joint creation. [...]

[...] If you share it with others, it is because others are concerned with variations of the same theme. [...]

[...] What you learn in your present about industry — “progress” — and the equitable sharing of the earth’s products, could only be learned in a context in which industrialism was experienced as going too far, where technology was seen and known as a growing jeopardy.