“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Evolution, as you think of it and as it is categorized by your scientists, represents but one probable line of evolution, the one in which, again, you are presently immersed.

[...] Your scientists are simply asking the wrong questions, and do not think in terms of such freewheeling structures.

I have mentioned earlier the peculiar problems of your scientists as with tools and instruments they attempt to reduce reality to their terms. [...] The instruments of the scientists, and the outer senses themselves, are camouflage patterns and cannot, and never will, dissect themselves.

[...] Your scientists know this. [...]

Any scientist who believes that life has no meaning has simply provided himself with what he thinks of as an unfailing support against life’s vicissitudes. [...]

Though scientists might find “cancer cells,” and though it might seem that cancer is caused by a virus, cancer instead involves a relationship, say, between what you might think of as a host and parasite, in those terms — and to some extent the same applies to any disease, including smallpox, though the diseases themselves may appear to have different causes completely. [...]

(Just before the session, we saw a newscast of a congressional committee in Washington, with some well-known scientists testifying as to the probable aftereffects of nuclear war—how the instigator would also eventually destroy itself even if the attacked never fired a retaliatory strike at all. [...]

[...] Scientists do not suspect the altered quality that such adrenaline action gives, though they recognize the negative effects of overproduction. [...]

[...] There, I hope, you will work at developing skills, in terms of the dream-art scientist (for instance; see Session 700 in Volume 1 of ‘Unknown’ Reality), and learn other professions than the ones you now know.”

[...] Now there is a scientist ready to get in touch with you when you are ready. [...]

Now: your visitor (Andrija Puharich) is a good man—a scientist and a child; an actor of a sort, searching for wonders. [...]

Some scientists and people in parapsychology will learn of our work through your friend because of his travels. [...]

[...] So far, scientists have been able to study electricity only by observing the projections of it that are perceivable within their terms of reference. [...]

[...] A study of dreams, for example, would make many of these points clear, yet many scientists consider such work beneath them.

Your scientists would learn more about the nature of dreams if they would train themselves in dream recall. [...]

Your scientists’ instruments are themselves distortive, and will only allow you to probe further into camouflage. [...] Your scientists think in terms of getting beyond earth’s atmosphere, and thus avoiding the distortions involved.

When it is understood that space and time are both camouflages, and that your cause and effect theory is a result of a continuity theory that no longer makes sense, then your scientists will recognize the impossibility of trying to decipher basic reality with camouflage instruments, and vehicles, that of themselves produce distortive theories, and only serve to probe further into a camouflage pattern.

[...] I read her two letters from female scientists in California that, I thought, would cheer her a great deal, since they both stressed the value of her work. [...]

[...] The gradations in physical matter forms alone escape your scientists. [...]

Then today we read how scientists at a company that markets animals for medical research have bred a strain of hairless laboratory mice without thymus glands. [...] Scientists often use “athymic” mice in cancer research, for example, since the mice do not reject tumor transplants. [...]

When your scientists finally decipher the physical realities behind the birth of your known universe, they will only discover that this was an exterior manifestation of a vital psychic reality that existed long before. [...]

[...] Your scientists will simply have to face the facts that consciousness comes first, and evolves its own form. [...]

[...] He enjoyed defying the physical evidence accepted by the scientist and others.

[...] I had many questions, ranging from the consciousnesses of the ants involved, and their right to life, as opposed to the “destructive” view taken of them by farmers, scientists, and so forth in the conventional sense. [...]

[...] When you look out into the universe from your viewpoint, it seems as if you look into the past.⁸ Scientists tell you that when the light from every distant galaxy reaches you, the galaxy is already dead. [...] Why is it that your scientists’ instruments do not allow them to look into the future instead, into worlds not yet born, since they operate so well in discerning the past? [...]

A number of scientists — biologists, zoologists, and psychologists, among others — have recently published highly praised books in which they claim to show how our genes manipulate our individual behavior with only their own genetic survival at stake, even when we think we are displaying subjective qualities like altruism. [...]

[...] Even the biologists (and other scientists) who insist upon our mechanistic bases do so with feeling!

[...] The sessions in one of the volumes published by Rick are accompanied by my drawings of the objects used in the series of “envelope tests” we conducted, both for ourselves and long-range with a well-known scientist, over some 11 months.