“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In such a state the channels to probabilities are open and receptive. [...]

[...] The book has just come out and we’ve seen reviews for it in many publications; the contrast between the reception accorded the book, and Jane’s, reminded me of my poor opinion of Prentice-Hall’s handling of Jane’s books. [...]

[...] Because, again as simply as I can explain it, because of our natures a certain field has been set up of receptivity, and though our positions change, the quotients within it do not.

[...] You have been much freer in opening of channels, and passively receiving and becoming receptive to inner information and experience.

(“What kind of a reception will the book receive?”)

[...] He will be more vulnerable or receptive to your moods than you are to his. [...]

[...] They have only met them at receptions (with amusement). They have an almost childlike wonder and curiosity about such matters, and will actually give you as much privacy as you want.

[...] Your beliefs are like receptive areas — open basins — that you use to collect information. [...]

(I think these changes in Jane during sessions are caused by her creative reception of a portion of an entity, an essence, that we call Seth, and by her own ideas of what this certain segment is like as she casts it in the masculine gender. [...]

[...] In greater terms their relationship with you is natural, of course, but their innate realization that the creature’s point of power is in the present is to some degree undermined by their own receptivity and translation of your beliefs. [...]

[...] Our idea was that our receptive state might make it possible for one of us to speak for another personality should one be present, or for another level of the self. [...]

While Seth dictated this book, devoted to the potentials of the psyche and its reception of inner information, my own experiences — as usual — seemed to serve as object lessons backing up his thesis. [...]

When the tests are given regularly we will automatically hit those evenings when conditions are excellent for reception. [...]

[...] Encourage his reception of relaxation. [...]

[...] However if he did not have such an outlet, and if you did not have such an outlet in your own work, then indeed we would have had much more trouble, because this layer of personal subconscious would then be not merely a receptive channel but one that also radioed its own noisy and demanding stations.

The ego chooses channels of reception with great discrimination; and, again, it censors anything which it feels is a threat to its own dominance. [...]

[...] At times he might think of writing in one area or another, but his imagination did not set up barriers: it was always receptive to new ideas, casting about for new experiences, consciously involved in the process of creativity.

[...] Certain words that I have used, in other words, are like gateways, and if you are receptive as you read the words you will enter the gateways, and the gateways will lead you to your own intuitional understanding. [...]

[...] And if I were you, I would tiptoe out the door before someone tells him what you have come up with, for I am also dependent to some idea upon his receptivity and ideas. [...]

[...] The voice effects carry him along so that he gives no attention, or very little attention, to what I am saying, and therefore we usually get a good reception in terms of clear communication.