“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This is basically behind your reaction, having to do with your early life. [...]

We are dealing with the psychology of experience, however, so you yourselves alter the situation according to your own reactions. [...]

[...] Before our sessions began your reactions were, as you might recall, much more vehement. [...]

Still an unhealthy reaction between two children. [...]

[...] This had something to do with his reaction, therefore. [...]

[...] The entire pattern of these latest sessions deals with your inner reactions to your beliefs about yourselves and the world. [...]

[...] I also didn’t ask Seth about Jane’s delayed reaction to the suggestions, so am making a note of that for next Saturday’s session, at Jane’s request. [...]

(Pause at 9:50.) Since it is the beliefs of the conscious mind that regulate the involuntary bodily motions and the entire physical system, then contradictory beliefs obviously set up adverse physical reactions and imbalances. [...]

[...] I wanted to show the ever-widening vital reactions that Seth’s dictation of “Unknown” Reality had on our personal lives, and how those effects rippled outward. [...]

[...] With some amusement we also considered the reactions of such radicals should they ever find themselves personally threatened or assaulted through the very “permissible” violence they advocate.

[...] It will cause immediate physical evocative reactions. [...]

[...] If you fully comprehend your power in the present, you will realize that action at that point also alters the past, its beliefs and your reactions.

The person will cause strong difficulties through overenthusiastic reactions and through some connections on which I am not clear with the person’s parent—I believe a mother.

[...] Events can trigger genetic activity—not simply through, say, chemical reactions, but through individual and mass beliefs about the safety or lack of it in the world at large.

[...] I hadn’t actually asked any questions of Seth; his material after break came through following my joking remark that I was half afraid to ask any, my reaction stemming from his discussion in the last deleted session, regarding Jane’s dislike of details, etc.

[...] I mentioned to Jane that it would be fun if Seth could give us a little bit on Rubin’s reaction when he saw the book on Cézanne—not on its contents.)

[...] But their reaction was quick enough once I explained the situation to them. [...]

[...] He had seen your family’s reaction to you as an artist. [...]

[...] I would like to suggest an experiment and I am suggesting it to you to see your reaction, like I couldn’t. I was really undecided whether to suggest it to Jane or to you, but you see like I’m kind of at an impasse because, like, there are a lot of words and a lot of concepts and philosophies bandied about, but when you make a claim you know such as that in as specific and nonconfusable terms such as that it would be very simple to demonstrate, and what I was wondering is, either now or at some time when Jane would agree to it, for instance, I brought some playing cards with me, ten cards...”)

[...] We are connected, however, in our psychological gestalt, and so I am aware of any intense feelings on your part, or strong reactions of any kind. [...]