“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] That is, why would we say we’re limited if we didn’t feel there was more to begin than we usually think there is?” It was another of those ideas that are quite obvious, once mentioned. [...]

[...] I’d even caught myself lapsing; I was weary,” Jane said, laughing, that she’d be willing to sit there until 3 o’clock in the morning to get what she wanted in a session, but: “You’re not sitting on your ass until three o’clock in the morning,” I said. [...]

[...] “They’re different, there’s no two ways about it …”

[...] Although one can say that her life is over in this reality, her lifework isn’t. Many have written that her books are new each time they read them — that they’re constantly finding new material in them. [...]

[...] For future reference, Joseph, and I repeat future, you should not probably need this for awhile, the words “All right Jane, you’re back now,” will always suffice to return Ruburt to his more usual condition.

[...] It creates itself in multitudinous forms, which then re-create fields, replenish each other. [...]

(There must be much more data available re the above paragraph. [...]

[...] The witness said the data contained many intuitive insights, etc., citing especially the material re ambiguous relationships, etc.)

[...] But you know: If you think you’re on to something no one else has, you’re afraid you’ll be called batty by the rest of the world … Seth is a great organizer, though. [...]

6. A note added later: We’re still acquiring information about the psychic connections between Jane and Seth, of course. [...]

[...] Maybe, I thought, we’re fated to never get those records. [...]

[...] “That sort of thing simply must go—we can’t afford to have such thoughts any more, they’re too destructive. [...]

[...] “Right now, for instance,” I said, “we’re alone and no one’s bothering us. [...]

[...] But then, isn’t that what we’re doing now, in a way? [...]

(Re the sentence by Seth about a book for Macmillan Co.: Richard Bach, of Seagull fame, and his editor from Macmillan, Eleanor Friede, are to visit us on Tuesday, September 19, according to a note Jane has received from him.)

[...] Lately Jane and I have taken to requesting that he finish each session this way, until we’re caught up on some projects we’ve been letting go. [...]

[...] We’re to receive a transcript of the material soon, and it will be incorporated in the deleted notebook.

[...] Although I liked the ideas in the session, then, in another way I found it discouraging, for it’s also saying that after all this time we’re still left to struggle with the old challenges; it hardly seems that we’ve moved very far off dead center, I guess. [...] Is it possible then that although we may be closely linked, we’re also quite separate in vital ways? [...]

([Ned:] “You’re never happy until you have been sad.”)

([Ned:] “You have to be sensitive, like you say you don’t have to be sad to be happy, but when you’re happy you have to be sensitive enough to realize that someone who is sad, that that is sadness. [...]

[...] We hardly think those attributes are “extra” at all, although they’re obviously more developed or consciously available in some individuals than in others — but then, so is a “gift” for music, or baseball or whatever. [...]

[...] But Jane and I do want to know more; we’re sure that Seth can help us here.

(Jane has been somewhat depressed the last few days because her legs have bothered her, even though evidently they’re in the process of loosening up in back of the knees. [...]

[...] We’re doing better at that than ever before.)

[...] In one way they’re like casual jottings that she left half finished and unseen in her journals, until I found them when I began searching for fresh material for the frontmatter of this Volume 2 of Dreams. [...]