“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It deals with problem-solving — it forms an hypothesis, and then seeks to prove it by trial and error.

[...] I am not here to prove anything. [...]

[...] This may throw you, but I will prove my case. I will also prove it even in so far as the so-called aging of rock formations and other archeological events are concerned. [...]

[...] In the meantime the pendulum should prove excellent.

The point is, that in such circumstances the person will try to use evidence from the outside world to prove that he is indeed being pursued.

[...] I had the feeling when she spoke those opening words tonight that they constituted a blend of her own conscious desires plus those of the trance personality, whatever “its” status may eventually prove to be.)

(I meant to add in the opening notes that Jane’s resiliency was proving a learning experience for Jeff Karder as well as for her and me.)

Television becomes a threat because he feels he is being asked to prove the unprovable, and yet since this is his life’s work he feels responsible to do so.

[...] The first question Seth referred to was the one about why the subconscious didn’t realize it was going to far, when it imposed or brought about symptoms, as in Jane’s case, that were proving to be too damaging to the body, compared to what they were supposed to protect the body against.

[...] It would prove he was being cherished. [...]

[...] I asked Seth for a break, but this proved to be the end of the session. [...]

[...] You cannot throw the burden of proof upon another, or expect a man or teacher to prove to you the validity of your own existence. [...]

He ate to prove he was still alive, for example (John 21, Luke 24, etc.), but they took this simply to mean that the spirit could partake of food. [...]

[...] When you feel at the same time that you must and should plow the driveway out yourself, to prove that you are the same as your neighbor, or to prove that you are physically agile, and on the other hand if you feel that you do not want to plow out the driveway at all, then you are in a quandary—and when you shovel, you tell your body to shovel and not to shovel at the same time, setting your muscles against each other.

(But this proved to be the end of the session. [...]

In this category, I am not referring to individuals like Ruburt, who speak for another personality with a sense of ease and tranquillity, and whose resulting information is excellent knowledge — the obvious products of uncommon common sense that proves to be helpful to the individual and others.

Now: You cannot prove scientifically that [your] world was created (pause) by a god who set it into motion, but remained outside of its dominion. Nor can you prove scientifically that the creation of the world was the result of a chance occurrence—so you will not be able to prove what I am going to tell you either. [...]

[...] Ruburt will prove to expand as you will. [...]

[...] The house at which you looked today should prove an excellent buy, though I am not necessarily speaking in financial terms. [...]

You will be sorry to leave, regardless of what you may think, but the new situation will prove greatly to your advantage, and will really be your first home.

[...] But one doctor soberly told me that I’d never walk again, or even put my weight upon my feet again, unless I underwent a series of joint-replacement operations—if, he cautioned, I proved to be a “proper candidate.”

[...] Particularly if, again, I proved to be a proper candidate.

[...] If you do not then you will forever be looking to others to prove your own merit to you, and you will never be satisfied. [...]

(A subsequent note, with some references: Seth’s closing remark about other books of Jane’s proved to be quite accurate. [...]

[...] Through testing “fate,” death-defiers try each time they perform to prove to themselves that they are indeed safe, that they can overcome life’s most dire conditions. [...]

[...] And will prove effective.

[...] Your experience will prove it out. [...]

[...] My experiences proved that I’d been a medium all along without knowing it, he said, and this could invalidate the book’s premise—that the experiments would work for anyone to some extent, regardless of their psychic background.

[...] “That proves the point, doesn’t it? [...]

[...] If I’d played down Seth’s importance and concentrated on some of the other experiments that were also proving successful, then the book would have a very good chance, the editor told me. [...]