“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You might find that you have proof of precognition in your own life that you’re ignoring.”

(We’ve largely finished correcting proofs on both the text and the drawing captions for Jane’s Adventures in Consciousness, which will be published in June. We’ve also seen a first color proof of the jacket design for her Dialogues, scheduled for publication next fall.⁴

[...] Obviously I am speaking here of scientific dogma, but such dogma is far more religious than scientific, for it also expects to be believed without proof, on faith alone.

Jane finished correcting the page proofs for If We Live Again five days after receiving them from Prentice-Hall, and yesterday I sent them back to our publisher. We’ll be seeing the frontmatter proofs later this month. [...]

[...] Jane and I spent two hard weeks erasing most of the suggested changes in the manuscript, and it is now headed for the printer for page proofs. [...]

For the future, keep still another possibility in mind, that of picking up an object from the location to which you have traveled, and bringing it back with you as proof. [...]

[...] A sort of suspension of what you might call logic is necessary before such feats can be performed well enough for there to be a scientific proof, definite enough to be accepted. [...]

[...] [We don’t expect to receive the page proofs for James, for correcting, until late next month.] Jane began to enjoy her break by writing poetry and doing some painting — but she surprised me when she also spontaneously began to rough out some of the notes for Psyche. [...]

[...] You see in such stories examples of meaningless deaths, and further proof of nature’s indifference to man. [...]

[...] You wanted to get on with your own work, and to wait for the proofs of my book. [...]

[...] Then, in order to obtain some physical proof that this was really happening, with my right hand I began to ‘carve’ a squarish hole a few inches across in the glass where Gus’s head had been. [...] And I ended up with the proof I wanted — an irregular hole that I had formed in the glass with my fingers. [...]

It is quite true however that proof is not necessary from my standpoint. [...]

[...] Proofs will be a natural result. [...]

[...] These were recognizable, tangible proofs of creativity. [...]

[...] No one, not even I, can hand you proof on a golden platter. [...]

[...] It is far more difficult to get objective proof for dream projections, yet the subjective proof is quite definite. [...]

[...] For any kind of scientific proof, of course, this would be a necessary preliminary.

(Seth reiterated some of the earlier material he has given us, concerning proofs, apparitions, etc. [...]

If earlier, however, Ruburt had the erroneous idea that he was going too fast—or would or could—and had to restrain himself and to exert caution, now he received the medical prognosis, the “physical proof” that such was not the case—and in fact that the opposite was true: he was too slow. [...]

(On the same day we received the letter from Holland, Jane also heard from Eleanor Friede, her editor at Delacorte Press: Eleanor sent the first color proof of the jacket design for Emir. [...]

(Yesterday I finished typing up the 841st session, so now I’m all caught up on the sessions that had piled up while Jane and I worked checking the page proofs for Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality, Psyche, and similar matters. [...]

John made a remark to the effect that he would like some sort of proof of Seth’s existence. [...]

[...] The very changes are proof of its powers of recuperation and resiliency.

[...] The tendency exists to suppose that any true evidence or proof of validity depends upon those effects that can be perceived through the outer senses. This tendency exists simply because you are unfamiliar with other types of validity, whose impact is every bit as real; so real in fact that once such proof has shown itself, even the intellect must be influenced and agree to a validity which it must admit it cannot understand.