“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] As soon as I realized that she was rebelling against a way of life that we had fallen into, probably mainly at my unwitting behest, I tried to make amends by leaving the job, etc. [...]

[...] Our landlord had told us earlier that people from Canada were coming to stay a week or ten days—in other words, as long as we would probably be here—but he hadn’t mentioned children. [...]

[...] I thought that probably the feelings should be allowed to come out violently, but we were inhibited by our surroundings, and probably fear, etc. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) You are both encountering new probabilities of a beneficial nature, and each time you do this you put new imprints or paths or impressions into reality, effectively changing reality in those desired ways. [...]

[...] Consciousnes had first to create the void or the dimension in which the system could exist, and also to endow that void with all the probabilities for development that have come about in your time and are to come about. [...]

In all probability you will become aware of me first either in a dream projection or in a session. [...]

[...] The day staff made the decision that I’d probably buy an ice cream log for their Christmas party, at which many goodies will be served; I’ll get to take some home also. [...]

If probabilities continue, then two of you will develop quite well during this year in two quite different areas. [...]

The events that you recognize as official have a unitary nature in time that precludes those probable versions of them, from which they arose — versions that appeared to one extent or another in the dream state. [...]

Do probable selves actually communicate with each other through their world-view frameworks, then, or can such an interchange of idea or emotion take place more “directly” at times — simply between the probable personalities involved? [...]

[...] One is probably just the state of Jane’s recent exceptional psychic receptivity. [...]

[...] According to Seth, a still-living probable self of Robert Butts, Sr., is “a well-known inventor, who never married but used his mechanically creative abilities to the fullest while avoiding emotional commitment.” [...]

[...] If you want something on probabilities I will give it to you at another time, and it will be, though briefly, discussed along with some material on reincarnation in this book.

(Lately I’ve been asking Jane if she thought Seth would give at least a short dissertation on probabilities for this book. [...]

[...] The building is old, but probably not as old as 1832. [...]

(Jane thinks the paper reference here could refer to the object being sandwiched between the two pieces of cardboard, or Bristol, inside the double envelope; for when she opened the envelopes she at first thought the canvas was glued to one of the pieces of Bristol—probably because she had seen me working out the gluing problem in the studio in recent weeks. [...]

[...] Besides skiing Ed probably used a snowmobile and snowshoes. [...]

1, 5: In today’s mail letter from Ed Robinson — Probably our 3rd?

[...] While discussing probabilities in the 565th session for Chapter 16 of that book he said. [...]

2. For some background information on Seth’s basic units of consciousness (CU’s), cells, probabilities, time structures and other material in connection with his delivery here, I suggest reviewing these sessions in Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality: 682–84, 688, and 694.

[...] That the soreness and so forth —really wild—was a reaction as the swirling energy was stirred (very long pause at 12:13) and allowed to escape at least partially—probably only as much as you could allow at once. [...]

Another point: the meetings in question alter probabilities, and again in a way that in your terms was hardly possible before, for the world looks on, so to speak. [...]

[...] The type of fragment your friend saw was of this type, but so disconnected from your friend, and so absentmindedly was it sent upon its travels, that its information was probably passed directly to the entity which your friend represents. [...]

[...] “But the reincarnational part is probably fantasy. [...]

[...] Tam Mossman has told us the book probably will be published before the end of the year.

[...] They also involve you in the most productive of enterprises as you begin to play with versions of events that are being considered for physical actualization, as on a personal level you “view” the probable events which your family, tribe, organization, community and country will actualize.

[...] Jane was fully dissociated—way out, as she put it, probably as far out as she has ever been. [...]

[...] The changes themselves will begin earlier, but you will probably not be sure of them yourself until the time that I have given. [...]

(I also wanted the latest word on the status of the auto accident probability data, involving Jane, and given on page 111 of the last session. [...]

This is rather difficult to explain: ions not behaving precisely (underlined) as they should, and variations in their activity, just beyond those considered probable.

In man, the probabilities of development are literally numberless. [...]

[...] Choices and probabilities apply. [...]