“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Following a discussion of reincarnation, probable selves and time. [...]

[...] Time has open ends in all directions or such a thing as probabilities would not exist. [...]

[...] You can tune in to certain probabilities and predict “that they will occur,” but free will always operates and no god in giant ivory figures says, this will happen February 15th at 8:05 and if no god predicts, then I do not see the point of doing so myself. [...]

[...] Now, in the operation of probabilities this has great significance for this means that you change and affect all events, and that your history books are a delightful fiction that tell you only your current ideas about the past. [...]

(John didn’t know about the name given for the drug, though the name Myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, came into his mind as a probable disease that the drug might be used for. [...]

[...] There will be an ultimate move west rather than east, with the company circumstances maintained, things being as they are now, and probabilities as I see them. [...]

[...] The effects lasted at least a minute and probably longer. [...]

[...] He believes he has such a probable self, and is endeavoring to visit this probable universe. [...]

[...] I mentioned earlier that in one probability system you were a doctor who painted as a hobby. [...]

[...] I can feel — I know — that Seth’s going to end his book soon now, probably tonight, and I don’t want it to happen, I guess.” [...]

[...] You may or may not have your own encounters with past reincarnational selves or probable selves. [...]

Christ knew however, clairvoyantly, that these events in one way or another would occur, and the probable dramas that could result. [...]

[...] You may instead, “pick up” an event in which a probable self is involved, according to your inclination, your psychic suppleness, your curiosity, your desire for knowledge. [...]

[...] You process daily experience, project it into what you think of as the future, choose from an infinity of probable events those you will make physical, and begin the mental and psychic processes that will bring them into the world of substance.

(Her fiction, Seth added, was Jane’s “way of probing probabilities and of trying to understand other people. [...]

Using such significances as yardsticks, you accept or reject probable events. [...]

[...] The entire fabric and framework of time and reality at each point is ascertained, and the probabilities probed and understood.

[...] Yet in a different way the same processes occur at other levels, as in its way cellular consciousness perceives all of the probabilities concerned with physical survival in its most far-reaching complications. [...]

[...] This doesn’t mean that I make believe we have no challenges, but that I for one refuse to dwell upon them, so as to not draw forth unwanted probabilities. [...]

[...] We were beginning to explain some new points about probabilities, as you surmised. [...]

[...] I am able to look from a different perspective, but still see only probabilities. On that particular evening I saw a probability that was not attractive. [...]

[...] While Seth insists that help comes from within, he did offer excellent advice to a few, along with correct clairvoyant impressions of their environments—probably to let me know we had the right person more than anything else.

[...] Because you listened to me, the probable future was changed.” [...]

All of this was highly interesting to Phil, who had no idea where the woman lived, and knew nothing about her except her name and probable age. [...]

[...] You ignore the ghost symbols or voices, the probable actions that also occur, but that are muffled in the clear tones of your accepted reality. [...]

The probable realities connected with your own system are like the suburbs, say, surrounding a main city. [...]

[...] You will instead pick up at best the ghost images, probabilities, and private data that are not officially recognized as part of the main reality’s official structure of events.

“2. Each reality is surrounded by its probabilities, but this is obviously relative …

In such a state the channels to probabilities are open and receptive. [...]

[...] Taking probabilities into consideration, there are cultural movements involving the western world as it tried to form a new philosophical stance, and our books may well provide a highly valuable alternate position for people—again—between the passionate beliefs systems of religion in many countries, and the overly objective dictates of science. [...]

(Seth probably refers here to a letter Jane received today from a fan in Ohio, who enclosed a copy of a letter he wrote defending her to Jacques Vallee, who evidently had mentioned Jane in one of his books. [...]

[...] Many probable actions are taken; these are then projected into the probable future.

[...] The reference to probabilities in the material reminded me of Chapter Sixteen in Seth Speaks. [...]

[...] Probabilities intersect at each point with your time, and those probabilities are psychologically directed so that, in your terms once again, he is at an excellent intersection point, where the prognosis is excellent. [...]

[...] Each such invisible particle contains within itself the potential (pause) to embark upon an infinite number of probable variations of consciousness. [...]

[...] Your connections with that unmanifest universe have always helped direct your imaginations, made you aware of the rich veins of probabilities possible in physical existence, so that you could then use your intellects to decide which of the alternate routes you wanted as a species to follow.

Man, however, deals with probabilities and with creativity in a unique fashion—a fashion that is made possible because of the far more dependable behavior of the other species.³

“Master events are actually other wrinkles in probabilities,” Jane said as we talked about this note. [...]

(That “earlier session” is the 687th, in Section 1, and in it Seth mentioned parallel man, probable man, and alternate man. [...]

1. While discussing probabilities and his units of consciousness in the 682nd session, in Section 1, Seth told us: “The idea of one universe alone is basically nonsensical. [...]

[...] For additional references on the way atoms and molecules — consciousness itself, in other words — can phase in and out of our probable reality, see Note 3 for the 684th session.

[...] The species tries out its probable reactions to probable events in the dream state, and hence is better prepared for action “in the future.”

[...] All of this is done somewhat in the way that a child plays, through the formation of creative dream dramas in which the individual is free to play a million different roles and to examine the nature of probable events from the standpoint of “a game.”

[...] Probabilities do operate, but I do sense this rather strongly, as if many probabilities pointed in this direction. [...]

(During break Jane told me that she had felt a sideways thrust of energy going out of her; she thought this probably an attempt at projection to Louisiana while in trance. [...]

[...] A car would be somehow involved, and a probable accident with another driver. [...]

[...] This is a probability. [...]

[...] When at last she began to talk she said she was “not really here, but not out of my body either,” while giving this automobile-accident probability data.

(Today had been probably the hottest of the year—well into the nineties —although as we made ready for the session the temperature had dropped to some degree.)

Probabilities are not pulled in by mere whim, but through desire and intent.

[...] Words, symbols, signs, anything that can be used by a personality, often become a new focus through which probabilities are altered. [...]

(“I’d like to go into the probability dreams, as I call them, concerning myself and my parents. [...]

[...] And for me, Jane’s condition came to stand for everything we don’t know in our particular joint, chosen, probable earthly reality.

[...] We quickly agreed that we’d been setting up the illness syndrome for years, yet the deep emotional shocks accompanying its physical developments seemed to come at us like attacking dark birds zooming in from another probable reality. [...]

[...] I am not referring now simply to probable selves. [...]

(Following an experiment to find other probable selves.)