Books:
TSM,
SS,
NoPR,
UR1 2,
NotP,
NoME,
TMA,
DEaVF1 2,
SDPC,
WTH,
TES1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9,
TPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,
ECS 1 2 3 4,
✖
Results 81 to 100 of 207 for stemmed:pretti
►
TES5 Session 219 January 3, 1966
Lorraine
Bunn
test
box
Mansfield
– The Early Sessions: Book 5 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 219 January 3, 1966 9 PM Monday as Scheduled
Two of these statements may appear at first glance to contradict themselves, but you shall shortly see that they do not, and you are left for now with a pretty question: for does the self, or identity, then form the perceptive dimension in which it exists, or is it created by the dimension?
[...]
Since the part of the data we can judge is pretty much on the ball, we think it reasonable to assume that the rest of Seth’s data may be equally good.
[...]
►
NoPR Part Two: Chapter 14: Session 654, April 9, 1973
reprogram
past
neuronal
present
biologists
– The Nature of Personal Reality
– © 2011 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Part Two: Your Body as Your Own Unique Living Sculpture. Your Life as Your Most Intimate Work of Art, and the Nature of Creativity as It Applies to Your Personal Experience
– Chapter 14: Which You? Which World? Your Daily Reality as the Expression of Specific Probable Events
– Session 654, April 9, 1973 9:45 P.M. Monday
►
DEaVF2 Chapter 10: Session 934, August 10, 1981
herbs
tribal
global
dreams
leaders
– Dreams, "Evolution", and Value Fulfillment: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Chapter 10: The Pleasure Principle. Group Dreams and Value Fulfillment
– Session 934, August 10, 1981 8:27 P.M. Monday
[...]
See Note 1 for an excerpt from the few short paragraphs of personal material Seth gave us before saying good night at 9:35 P.M. Then see Note 2 for what is surely a pretty wild idea of mine.)
►
TPS6 Deleted Session June 3, 1981
uncertainty
certainty
Jim
uncertain
tension
– The Personal Sessions: Book 6 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2017 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session June 3, 1981 8:53 PM Wednesday
[...]
Interesting, for I think Jim phrased some of his quotes somewhat differently to Jane than he had to me earlier this week —although I think the gist of the remarks is pretty much the same.
[...]